Peer Review History: Antibacterial Efficacy of Different Intracanal Irrigants on Root Canal Treatment: An In-Vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, Assistant Professor, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA and William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Belén Alonso-Ortiz, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

(2)  Aline Porciúncula Frenzel, Catholic University of Pelotas, Brazil.

(3) Adnan, Mohi-Ud-Din Islamic University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (M. Belén Alonso-Ortiz, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aline Porciúncula Frenzel, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Adnan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Nutrient Management Sources on the Vegetative Growth, Flowering and Sex Expression of the Bottle Gourd [Lagenaria siceraria L.] c. v. BBOG-3-1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuswanto, Jambi University, Indonesia.

(2) Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates.

(3) T. Mahakavi, Government Arts College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Evy Latifah, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia.

(2) Hudhaifa Maan AL-Hamandi, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(3) Magdy Shahin Mohamed Hussein, Al- Azhar University, Egypt.

(4) Pet-Gospel Okoro, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kuswanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Imran Arshad, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (T. Mahakavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determination of Nutrient Content of Guava Cv. ‘Pant Prabhat’ Affected by Different Canopy Heights and Planting Densities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong In Kuk, Sunchon National University, South Korea.

Reviewers:

(1) Elvino Ferreira, Federal University of Rondonia, Brazil.

(2) Pornrat Sinchaipanit, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Affi Naziha, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elvino Ferreira, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pornrat Sinchaipanit, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphology and Influence of Abiotic Factors on Magnaporthe grisea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Professor, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Sangita Sahni, Assistant Professor, Tirhut College of Agriculture, Dholi, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Bihar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Weixiang Wang, Beijing Agriculture University, China.

(2) Eman Khalil Abdul-Karim, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Hülya Sayği, Çukurova University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bouzid Nasraoui, University of Carthage, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Weixiang Wang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Eman Khalil Abdul-Karim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hülya Sayği, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perfomance of Varieties on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Under Prayagraj Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Khaled Abdou Hassan Shaban, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI), Egypt.

(2) Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhagyashree Kesherwani, Prof. Rajendra Singh University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Khaled Abdou Hassan Shaban, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Iqtidar Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Research on the Assessment of Mathematical Intuitive Imagination Literacy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Indah Suciati, Alkhairaat University, Indonesia.

(2) Ivy H. Casupanan, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

(3) Yahaya Garba Shawai, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Indah Suciati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ivy H. Casupanan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Yahaya Garba Shawai, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Instructional Design Ability of Pre-service Mathematics Teachers in China

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bashar H. Malkawi, Professor, Global Professor, Practice in Law at the University, Arizona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sofowora Olaniyi Alaba, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria.

(2) Aderogba Oladiran Adewusi, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(3) Belgin Bal Incebacak, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sofowora Olaniyi Alaba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Aderogba Oladiran Adewusi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Belgin Bal Incebacak, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey on the Halal Goat Production System in the Province of Maguindanao, Bangsamoro (Barmm), Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mario A. Pagnotta, Professor, Tuscia University, Italy.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt, and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Risvanli, Fırat University, Turkey.

(2) Ibrahim Samir Abd El-Hamid, Desert Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) P. Ravi kumar, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ali Risvanli, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ibrahim Samir Abd El-Hamid, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (P. Ravi kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Aromatic Heterocyclic Organic Compounds

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Suja Mathai, Mar Ivanios College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Loh Yean Chun, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suja Mathai, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Loh Yean Chun, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparison of Postoperative Healing between Two Different Flaps for 3rd Molar Surgery in Controlled Diabetic Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Dharmashree Satyarup, Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Navneet Kour, PT. BD Sharma University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dharmashree Satyarup, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Navneet Kour, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA