Peer Review History: Advantages of Ecosystem Services to Human Being

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Adjunct Professor, Hebei Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Malek Hassanpour, Osmanis University, India.

(2) Bosede Remilekun, Ondo State Law Commission, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bonface O. Manono, South Eastern Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Efuetlancha Ernest Nkemleke, University of Dschang, Cameroon.

(3) Kadhim Jawad Lafta Al-Zaidy, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.

(4) Shoukat Ali Shah, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Malek Hassanpour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bosede Remilekun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Atlantoaxial Instability in Children, 26 Years of Experience

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fuyong Jiao, Prof and Head, Children’s Hospital of Shaanxi Provincial People’s Hospital ( S P P H ), Xi, an Jiaotong University , China.

(2) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Tarek A Abulezz, Sohag Univesity, Egypt.

(2) Hendrik, Health Polytechnic Makassar Ministry of Health, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hernâni Pombas Caniço, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

(2) Vallada Atinga, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(3) Wissam Sajid Hashim, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

(4) Oscar Rojo del Moral, Hospital Christus Muguerza, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tarek A Abulezz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hendrik, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Online Distance Learning Readiness of Senior High School Students in a Philippine Public School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bashar H. Malkawi, Professor, Global Professor, Practice in Law at the University, Arizona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand Jayant Mayee, India.

(2) Farhang Salehi, APH Rosha, Iran.

(3) Victoria Magano Amakali, Namibian College of Open Learning, Namibia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anand Jayant Mayee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farhang Salehi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Victoria Magano Amakali, Namibia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Quinoa Seed Powder for Preparation of Sugarfree Burfi by Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nelson Pérez Guerra, Professor, Ourense Campus, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Food Technology Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Yakov G. Verkhivker, Odessa Technological University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aderibigbe Foluso, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Elisabete Coentrão Marques, Fluminense Federal University, Brazil.

(3) Irina-Adriana Chiurciu, Romania.

(4) Mohamed Moustafa Abd El-Rzik, Agriculture College, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yakov G. Verkhivker, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as Affected by Bio-Fertilizer and Seaweed Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Delian Elena, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Arief Harsono, Indonesian Legume and Tuber Crops Research Institute, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Delian Elena, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arief Harsono, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Sixteen Year Old Male with Intestinal Malrotation by Ladd’s Procedure: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Panagiotis Tsibouris, NIMTS General Hospital, Greece.

(2) Maria Paparoupa, University Medical Center Hamburg, Germany.

(3) Traian Dumitrascu, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Panagiotis Tsibouris, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria Paparoupa, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Traian Dumitrascu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization of Profit and Land Resources for Marginal/Small Farmers – A Linear Programming Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Yaseen, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar, Chaudhary Ranbir Singh University, India.

(2) Marco Ferretti, Italy.

(3) Nirmal Kumar Betchoo, Universite des Mascareignes, Mauritius.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lisho Mundia, Namibia.

(2) Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture Umudike, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Deepak Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marco Ferretti, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Nirmal Kumar Betchoo, Mauritius) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Radio Wave Propagation in a Forested Channel

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Y. Thiagarajan, Associate Professor, Christ College of Engineering and Technology, Puducherry, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suraya Mubeen, CMR Technical Campus, India.

(2) Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, UNICAMP/FEEC, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M Ambika, India.

(2) B Siva Kumar Reddy, CMREC, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suraya Mubeen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Some Aspects of Life for Egg Parasite Pseudoligosita babylonica Viggiani (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, Professor, Division National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Channaveerappa. H, University of Mysore, India.

(2) Shaaban Abd-Rabou, Plant Protection Research Institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Channaveerappa. H, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Shaaban Abd-Rabou, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) of General Population towards COVID-19 in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Assistant Professor, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Roopa K P, Sapthagiri College of Engineering, India.

(2) Sneha Thakur, St Pauls College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) K. Ponmozhi, Kalasalingam  Academy of Research  and Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alice Jayapradha C, Maris Stella College, India.

(2) Omid Heydari Shayesteh, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Vahid Ghaffari laleh, University of Tabriz, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Roopa K P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sneha Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (K. Ponmozhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA