Peer Review History: Design and Evaluation of Sorafenib Tosylate Nanoparticles Including Assessment of IC50 Values using PC Cell Lines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Professor and Researcher, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kartika Rathore, JNVU, India.

(2) Sharad Kondiba Kamble, Nootan College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Ghada Abd Alrhman Taqa, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Meena Chakraborty, Govt. Naveen College Bori, India.

(2) Stellee Marcela Petris Biscaia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kartika Rathore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sharad Kondiba Kamble, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ghada Abd Alrhman Taqa, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Psychosocial Correlates of Depression among Apprentice Artisans in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Redhwan Ahmed Mohammed Al-Naggar, Professor, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Karol Karasiewicz, University of Szczecin, Poland.

(2) Nor Firdous Mohamed, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Karol Karasiewicz, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nor Firdous Mohamed, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determining the Influence of Boron and Sulphur on Growth, Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Meritorious Autonomous University of Puebla, Mexico.

(2) Champa Lal Khatik, SKNAU, India.

(3) Yasser Ismail, University of Illinois, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bal Krishna Jha, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dolores Castañeda Antonio, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Champa Lal Khatik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Yasser Ismail, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nurturing Teenagers with Special Needs: As a Basis for Government Intervention Programs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Alexandrina Cardoso, Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, Porto School of Nursing, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Darlan Tavares dos Santos, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (Unirio), Brasil.

(2) Nuruddin Ahmed Masud, Huzhou University, China.

(3) Poonam Agrawal, Sharda University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alfa Celene Rea Amaya, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

(2) V.A.Jyothi, AYJ National Institute of Speech and Hearing Disabilities, India.

(3) Christopher William Tarr, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Darlan Tavares dos Santos, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nuruddin Ahmed Masud, China) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Poonam Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance Evaluation of Synthetic and Natural- Based Surfactants for Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Professor, Tanta University, Smouha, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Monaem elmnifi, Bright star university, Libya.

(2) Mohammad Bazvand, Sahand University of Technology, Iran.

(3) JK Bwapwa, Mangosuthu University of Technology, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Monaem elmnifi, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Bazvand, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (JK Bwapwa, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Small-scale Demucilager Machine for Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, Associate Professor & HOD, SRM TRP Engineering College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

(2) Adib Bin Rashid, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Er. Sunil Kumar, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) J. M. Makavana, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(3) Peter Kolawole, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Nigeria.

(4) Rasoul Loghmanpour Zarini, Technical and Vocational University, Iran.

(5) Tunji John Erinle, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(6) Yasir Zulfiqar, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alireza Allameh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Adib Bin Rashid, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Maintenance Management Practices in Electricity Industry in Arab World: Case Study in Jordan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Professor, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexander Siyanov, Moscow Automobile and Road Engineering State Technical University, Russia.

(2) P. Narasimman, Kings College of Engineering, India.

(3) G. Srinivas, Kings College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayong Hiendro, Tanjungpura University, Indonesia.

(2) I Made Ginarsa, University of Mataram, Indonesia.

(3) Jilun Miao, Chongqing Jiaotong University, P.R.China.

(4) Iorga Mirela Ioana, National Institute for Research and Development in Electrochemistry and Condensed Matter –INCEMC, Romania.

(5) Muthujumar. K, Bannari Amman Institute of Technology, India.

(6) Sunil S, Sri Venkateshwara College of Engineering, India.

(7) Vaidehi  M., Visveswaraya  Technological University, Dayanadasagar College of Engineering, India.

(8) Yong Ching Yee, University of Technology Sarawak, Malaysia.

(9) Ignacio Enrique Zaldívar Huerta, Instituto Nacional de Astrofísica, Mexico.

(10) Dak Bahadur Khadka, Institute of engineering,Tribhuwan University, Nepal

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alexander Siyanov, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Narasimman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (G. Srinivas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Good Building Design and Construction Practices in Barangay Baybay, Catarman, Northern Samar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Heba Abdallah Mohamed Abdallah, Associate Professor, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Phani Madhavi, Bapatla Engineering College, India.

(2) Mahmoud Owais, Assiut University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amey Kossi Bollanigni, Université De Lomé, Institut FORMATEC, Togo.

(2) Gong JIanqing, Hunan University, China.

(3) Jiří Vala, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Republic.

(4) Sohaib Naseer, Nottingham Trent University, United Kingdom.

(5) Pa.Suriy, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation, India.

(6) A. Suresh Kumar, Mohan Babu University, India.

(7) Madhav Narayan Shrestha, Asian Institute of Technology and Management, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (T. Phani Madhavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mahmoud Owais, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of the Functional Outcome of Arthroscopic Management of the Meniscal Injury in Knee Joint at Tertiary Care Centre

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ikem, Innocent Chiedu, Professor, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Solyom Arpad, University of Medicine, Romania.

(2) Arendra Singh Kushwaha, King George’s Medical University, India.

(3) Shrihari L Kulkarni, SDM Medical College, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syed Dil Bagh Ali Shah, Khyber Medical College/ University, Pakistan.

(2) Veenesh Selvaratnam, Malaysia.

(3) Vijay Panchanadikar, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Solyom Arpad, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Arendra Singh Kushwaha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Shrihari L Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seed Priming’s Effectiveness in Improving Okra Germination and Seedling Growth

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramyajit Mondal, Seacom Skills University, India.

(2) Yatim Meriem, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jibrin Naka Keta, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Matheus Gomes da Cruz, State University of Amazonas, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ramyajit Mondal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yatim Meriem, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA