Peer Review History: A Mini-Review: The Role of Chitosan in Aquaculture Fish Health Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanuel Tetteh-Doku Mensah, Research Scientist, CSIR-Water Research Institute, Ghana.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebru Yilmaz, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Turkey.

(2) Akinfiresoye Waleola Ayo, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bryan Okoth Omondi, Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Kenya.

(2) Hassan Faruk Maradun, National Institute for Freshwater Fisheries Research, Nigeria.

(3) Mounir Belbahloul, University Hassan, Morocco.

(4) Önder Yildirim, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Turkey.

(5) M. A. Augie, Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ebru Yilmaz, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akinfiresoye Waleola Ayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Board Independence, Board Diligence and Audit Report Lag in Listed Deposit Money Banks in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, Visiting Professor, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hafizah Hammad Ahmad Khan, University Teknologi Mara, Malaysia.

(2) G Sankaranarayanan, Guru Nanak College , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Posma Sariguna Johnson Kennedy, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Indonesia.

(2) Aftab Ahmed Memon, Nanjing Agricultural University, Pakistan.

(3) Ayesha Iftikhar, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.

(4) Corina Flores Hernández, Universidad De Guanajuato, Mexico.

(5) Elói Martins Senhoras, Federal University of Roraima, Brazil.

(6) Gilaninia  Shahram, Iran.

(7) Hassan Elsan Mansaray, Sierra Leone.

(8) Gilaninia  Shahram, Iran.

(9) Minati Rani Mohapatra, India.

(10) Mironiuc Marilena, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iași, Romania.

(11) Tasya Aspiranti, Bandung Islamic University, Indonesia.

(12) Zsuzsanna Széles, University of Sopron, Hungary.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hafizah Hammad Ahmad Khan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (G Sankaranarayanan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Farmers’ Perception about Uzhavan App in Select Districts of Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ian McFarlane (Retired), School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of Reading, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Eduardo Figueiredo, Brasil.

(2) Raj Kumar Yogi, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J. B. Kathiriya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Budhi Waskito, Universitas Bandar Lampung, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eduardo Figueiredo, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Raj Kumar Yogi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Scale to Measure Performance of Extension Personnel in Promoting Sustainable Dry Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Yaseen, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Santhosha, K. M, University Of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) B. K. Gupta, Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jasim M Saleh, University of  Fallujah, Iraq.

(2) Jeebanjyoti Behera, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Sajad A. Saraf, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

(4) Sunday Alagba Obazi, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.710

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Santhosha, K. M., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (B. K. Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Diagnosis of Developmental Delay in Children

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rui Yu, The University of North Carolina, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Rupa Ashok Verma, MKSSS Sitabai Nargundkar College of Nursing for Women, India.

(2) Todd Richards, University of Washington Medical Center, USA.

(3) Maria Lyra-Georgosopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rupa Ashok Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Todd Richards, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria Lyra-Georgosopoulou, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


.

Peer Review History: Immunohistochemical Analysis of B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) as a Novel Marker in Correlation with Its Serum Level to Predict Multiple Myeloma Patients’ Outcome

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sandra Aparecida Marinho, Professor, Paraíba State University (Universidade Estadual da Paraíba – UEPB), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ardilles Juan Carlos Alves dos Santos, Federal University of Piauí, Brazil.

(2) Lakshmi Agarwal, GMC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ardilles Juan Carlos Alves dos Santos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lakshmi Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sero-Epidemiology of Transfusion Transmissible Hepatitis B, C and E among Blood Donors in Ekiti, Southwestern Nigeria: A Cross-sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rui Yu, Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) I S Chaitanya Kumar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Mburu Samuel, Kirinyaga University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bogireddy Sahithi, Raghavendra Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (RIPER)- Autonomous, India.

(2) Dharmashree Satyarup, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

(4) Tamanna Urmi, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine, Bangladesh.

(5) Archana Shetty, Dyananda Sagar University, India.

(6) Japheth C. Kipkulei, MOI University, Kenya.

(7) José Ednésio da Cruz Freire, Federal University of Ceará, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I S Chaitanya Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mburu Samuel, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Massive Cholera Outbreak in Shaheed Benazir Abad, Sindh, Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vachel Gay V. Paller, Associate Professor, Animal Biology Division Institute of Biological Sciences, University of the Philippines Los Banos, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Kumama, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

(2) Abdulwahed Al Serouri, Yemen.

(3) José Manuel Ortega Zufiría, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nirav Nimavat, Dr.Kiran C.Patel Medical College and Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kumama, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abdulwahed Al Serouri, Yemen) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (José Manuel Ortega Zufiría, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Statistical Measurement System of High-Quality Development Level of Cities – Based on Yangtze River Delta Region of China

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Fülöp Melinda Timea, Romania.

(2) Kishore NK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chamoli Anjana, Dr. Lankapalli Bullayya College, India.

(2) Rajeev Singh Rana, S.G.R.R P.G College, India.

(3) Sandip Majumder, Durgapur Government College, India.

(4) Edward Yeboah, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(5) Satyanarayana Turangi, National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fülöp Melinda Timea, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kishore NK, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Applicability of Concept of Dinacharya (Daily Routine) to Maintain Healthy Life Styles of Patients of Madatyaya and Their Morbidities with Special Reference to Alcoholism – A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, Associate Professor, University of Padua, Italy.

(2) Dr. Mohan Khadka, Birat Medical College Teaching Hospital, Nepal.

Reviewers:

(1) Harish Daga, Parul Institute of Ayurved Parul University, India.

(2) Ambika Dhiman, Prabudh Ayurvedic Medical College, India.

(3) Parameswarappa S Byadgi, BHU, India.

(4) Bhavya B. M, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(5) Suhas A. Chaudhary, CCRAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anagha Mathad, Parul Institute of Ayurved and Rsesearch, India.

(2) Ankur Singhal, GS Ayurveda Medical College & Hospital, India.

(3) Asha S.A., Institution: Govt. Ayurveda Medical College, India.

(4) Kirti Rajendra Bhati, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), College of Ayurved, India.

(5) Madhu Ranjan, Sri Paripoorna Sanathana Ayurveda Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, India.

(6) Manjula K, Parul Institute of Ayurved & Research, India.

(7) Minshu Prashant, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(8) Prasanth.R.Krishnan, Parul University, India.

(9) Santosh Tanaji Kadam, GSMC and KEM Hospital.

(10) Sujata K.Shamkuwar, Government Ayurved College, India.

(11) Suvarna Abhijit Katti, M.G.V.’s Pharmacy College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Harish Daga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ambika Dhiman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Parameswarappa S Byadgi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Bhavya B. M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Suhas A. Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA