Peer Review History: An Assessment Study on Consumer Knowledge and Purchasing Behavior Regarding Food Safety

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nguyen Van Toan, School of Biotechnology, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Reviewers:

(1) Mariana Florica Bei, University of Oradea, Romania.

(2) Radhiahtul Raehan Mustafa, Islamic Civilisation Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Sudeepta Raha, Christ Academy Institute for Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dave Vincent Mangilet, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines.

(2) Sumbul Zehra, Galgotias University, K.M. Govt. Girls P.G. College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mariana Florica Bei, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Radhiahtul Raehan Mustafa, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sudeepta Raha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Analysis of Environmental and Social Practices in the Sugar Industries of Brazil and Southern Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Lecturer, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Sujata Sinha, Indian Council of Medical Research, India.

(2) Andolo Dan Ojijo, Maseno University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sujata Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Andolo Dan Ojijo, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphometric Characterization and Fillet Yield of Two Commercial Fish Species from Panyam Fish Farm Plateau State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Mendoza-Carranza, The south border College, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid, Brazil.
Reviewers:

(1) Lyndon Nii Adjiri Sackey, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Omer Abu-alhassan Ossman Idam, University of Gezira, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lyndon Nii Adjiri Sackey, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Omer Abu-alhassan Ossman Idam, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibacterial Activity of Benzophenones Derived from the Ripe Fruit Extract of Garcinia xanthochymus against Streptococcus mutans

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anandamoy Rudra, Bengal School of Technology, India.

(2) L Md. Bhakshu, Dr. YSR Government Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jasmin Islam, Assam Down Town University, India.

(2) Joy Biswas, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anandamoy Rudra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (L Md. Bhakshu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agricultural Water Conservation Methods: Application, Difficulties, and Innovation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushant Kumar, College of Technology, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Hamed Beigi, University of Tehran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushant Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamed Beigi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Management of Uterine Prolapse in a Multiparous Persian Cat: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Senthilkumar, Veterinary College & Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Veterinary & Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) B. Bibin Becha, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asloob Ahmad Malik, Shere-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

(2) B.Balamurugan, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(3) Malasri G, KVAFSU, India.

(4) Mosa Fadiel Abbas

(5) University of basrah, Iraq.

(6) Vikas Sachan, COVAS, SVPUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Senthilkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B. Bibin Becha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Fruit, Seed Traits and Seedling Growth Performance of Different Seed Sources of Calophyllum inophyllum

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushmita Thapa, Himalayan College of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Nepal.

(2) Gerald H. Lushington, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hailu. Regassa, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushmita Thapa, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gerald H. Lushington, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Live Mulch, Brown Manuring and Herbicides on Growth and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in Southern Midland Zone of Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhavan Gnanasekaran, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Madahb Kumar Datta, Sri Sri University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ammar Jassim Al-Khaz’Ali, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhavan Gnanasekaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madahb Kumar Datta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) Productivity through Good Agricultural Practices in Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Chennamadhava, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(2) Yashaswini Sharna, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. L. Prakash, Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Chennamadhava, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yashaswini Sharna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Drone Technology in Agricultural Practices: A SWOC Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpi R. Sindhu, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Jay Singh, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alexandru Tabusca, Romanian-American University, Romania.

(2) Marija Bajagić, University Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(3) Umangkumar Bharatbhai Zalavadiya, Parul Institute of Techonology, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpi R. Sindhu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jay Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA