Peer Review History: The cytological Aspect of Clinically Concerned Supraclavicular lymphadenopathy- a Prospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Prunoiu Virgiliu-Mihail, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Keerthi Narayan V, Dr MGR Educational and Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dattatreya Mukherjee, Jinan University, P.R China.

(2) A K Maurya, KGMU Lucknow, India.

(3) Hari Shankar Sharma, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

(4) Juan Francisco Morales Leon, Tulane University, Ecuador.

(5) Meenakshi. S, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(6) Prema Saldanha, Yenepoya Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Prunoiu Virgiliu-Mihail, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Keerthi Narayan V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Docking Analysis of Bacoside A with Selected Signalling Factors Involved in Glioblastoma

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, College of Business, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Audumbar Digambar Mali, Sahyadri College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Bene Mc, Nantes University, France.

(3) Zeinab Abd Elkhalek Ali El-Shahid, Pharmaceutical Drug Industry and Research Institute,  National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

M.Xavier Suresh, VIT Bhopal University, India.

Nidhi Rani, Chitkara College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Audumbar Digambar Mali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bene Mc, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zeinab Abd Elkhalek Ali El-Shahid, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Whitening Cream: A Cross-sectional Study in Tertiary Care Setting

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Maab I AL-Farwachi, College of veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Sadique Hussain, Jaipur National University, India.

(3) Ho Yin Pekkle Lam, Tzu Chi University, Taiwan.

(4) Jayakar Thomas, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, India.

(5) Shirin Quazi, Sangam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akinlolu Bankole Fawehinmi, Nigeria.

(2) Prema  Ranjani  Waratenne, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(3) Sonlimar Mangunsong, Health Polytechnic of Palembang, Indonesia.

(4) P S Suman Babu, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(5) Sushmitha E S, RGUHS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maab I AL-Farwachi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sadique Hussain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ho Yin Pekkle Lam, Taiwan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Jayakar Thomas, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Shirin Quazi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Predisposing Factors Leading to Warfarin Toxicity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Camilo Torres-Serna, Universidad Santiago de Cali, Colombia.

(2) Erisnaldo Francisco Reis, UNIFAVENI, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zhong Jingquan, ShanDong University, China.

(2) Bassi, Peter Usman, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(3) Bensu Karahalil, Gazi University, Turkey.

(4) Flavia C. Zacconi, Pontificia Universidad , Chile.

(5) Sumathi, Emory University, United States of America.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Camilo Torres-Serna, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Erisnaldo Francisco Reis, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pediatric Anthropometrics: An Observational Study from Indus Medical College, Tando Muhammad Khan, Sindh, Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, College of Business, USA.

(2) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Elias Ezo, Wachemo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Paraschiva Chereches-Panta, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Hatieganu”, University in Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gurdeep Singh, Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital, USA.

(2) Nitya K, India.

(3) Priyanka.A, Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical College and Research Institute, India.

(4) R. Saroja Preethy, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elias Ezo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Paraschiva Chereches-Panta, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biliary Atresia: GGT vs Histopathology as Diagnostic Tool

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, College of Business, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ulfat Amin, Islamic University of Science and Technology, India.

(2) C. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Universidad de Guadalajara, México.

(3) Raashid Hamid, Kashmir Institute of Medical Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abiyie Zeleke  Alem, Debre Markos University and Debre Markos Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.

(2) Anuragsingh Chandel, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Mariam  Akhrif, children’s hospital, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ulfat Amin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (C. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Raashid Hamid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Phenomenological Approach to Multi-Higgs Production at High Energy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalil Kassmi, Professor, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco.

(2) Dr. Jelena Purenovic, Associate Professor, Kragujevac  University, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Gerald B. Cleaver, Baylor University, USA.

(2) Godfrey Ikeozahu Ojerheghan, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(3) Vipin Jain, Csir-national Physical Laboratory, India.

(4) Hova Hoavo, University of Kara, Togo.

(5) Giorgio Sonnino, Universite’ Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Belgium.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) André Felippe Vieira da Cunha, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

(2) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, México.

(3) Luis Augusto TrevisanUniversidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Brasil.

(4) Shashank Sharma, Kalinga University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gerald B. Cleaver, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Godfrey Ikeozahu Ojerheghan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Vipin Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Hova Hoavo, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Giorgio Sonnino, Belgium) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Computational Translation Features of Chinese Translation of Emily Dickinson’s Poetry: A Comparison of Kang Yanbin’s and Wang Jinhua’s Translations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Endang Sulistianingsih, Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Indonesia.

(2) Cynthia Whissell, Laurentian University, Canada.

(3) P Moodley, South Africa.

(4) Robyn Lee Najar, Sichuan University, China.

(5) Odingowei M. Kwokwo, Niger Delta University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Clara Herlina Karjo, Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia.

(2) Zhang Youwen, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics Dongfang College, China.

(3) Lok Raj Sharma, Makawanpur Multiple Campus, Nepal.

(4) Baohua Dong, Chongqing University of Science and Technology, China.

(5) Gang Xu, Inner Mongolian Minzu University, China.

(6) Omar A. Sheikh Al-Shabab, International University for Science and Technology, Syria.

(7) Rajat, Chitkara University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Endang Sulistianingsih, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cynthia Whissell, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (P Moodley, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Robyn Lee Najar, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Odingowei M. Kwokwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Spinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Elshymaa A. Abdelnaby, Veterinary Medicine Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Xinxing Wu, University of Kentucky, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhawana Rastogi, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(2) Vibhu Krishnan Viswanathan, Univ of Calgary, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elshymaa A. Abdelnaby, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Xinxing Wu, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Trimester Placental Volume and Uterine Artery Doppler in Pregestational Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Pregnant Women

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Professor, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nicolae Gica, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Sreelatha S, RGUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nicolae Gica, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sreelatha S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA