Peer Review History: Trend in Area, Production, and Productivity of Groundnut in Rajasthan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tagesse Abo Melketo, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Rakesh Roy, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Noor Ul Islam Wani, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tagesse Abo Melketo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rakesh Roy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Flutter Modelling and Computation of a Flying Wing Aircraft

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Professor,Tanta University, Smouha, Alexandria, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Raad Yahya Qassim, Professor, The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Kuo-Chien , Liao, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Jacob Nagler, Israel.

(3) Haim  Abramovich, Israel.

(4) Rudresh M, Dayananda Sagar College of Engineering, India.

(5) Niculescu Mihai Leonida, INCAS – National Institute for Aerospace Research “Elie Carafoli”, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kuo-Chien , Liao, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jacob Nagler, Israel) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Haim Abramovich, Israel) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Rudresh M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Niculescu Mihai Leonida, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Plasmodial Prevalence with Respect to Gender in 6 Villages Around Balombo Town, Benguela Province, Angola, before Malaria Vector Control Implementation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shankar Srinivasan, Associate Professor, Rutgers – School of Health Professions, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdullahi Yahaya, Kano University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Belquis Abdullah Ahmed Farea, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jose Marcos, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

(2) Sabelo Nick Dlamini, University of Swaziland, Swaziland.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdullahi Yahaya, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Belquis Abdullah Ahmed Farea, Yemen) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sensitivity and Resistance Patterns of Gram-Negative Uropathogens Isolated from the Urine of Patients with Upper/Lower Urinary Obstruction in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rui Yu, Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Asis  Manna, ID & BG Hospital, India.

(2) Yasser Fakri Mustafa, College of Pharmacy, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asis Manna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yasser Fakri Mustafa, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hydroponic Technique: A New approach for Crop Production at Trans Himalayan High-altitude Cold Desert Regions of India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia,  Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Matheus Gomes da Cruz, State University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(2) Partha Pratim Behera, Assam Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aruna Rai, Smt. C H M College, Mumbai University, India.

(2) Matheus Gomes da Cruz, State University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(3) Yasser Ismail, University of Illinois, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Matheus Gomes da Cruz, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Partha Pratim Behera, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethno-botanical Survey and Chemical Study of Medicinal Plants Traditionally used to Treat Anemia in Yakoma Territory (Nord Ubangi), Democratic Republic of the Congo

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Bahmanzadegan, Iran.

(2) Deepti Tomar, Govt. Degree College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Apekshita Singh, Amity University, India.

(2) A. Ranganadha Reddy, VFSTR Deemed to be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 ( A. Bahmanzadegan, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deepti Tomar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emergent New Anti PD-1/PD-L1 Small Molecules for Cancer Treatment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Krishnangshu Bhanja Choudhury, Assistant professor, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Haruhiko Sugimura, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Japan.

(2) Zeineen Momin, Baylor College of Medicine, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Wissam Sajid Hashim, Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bushra Jasim Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Haruhiko Sugimura, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Zeineen Momin, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Online Learning in Higher Education, Perception and Challenges during the Era of Coronavirus Pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. M. Camino Escolar-Llamazares, Professor, Psychology in the Area of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Burgos, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Rasha Ali Ahmed Abdelmowla, Assiut University,  Egypt.

(2) Ng Tsz Kit, University of Hong Kong, China.

(3) Pasupuleti Venkata Siva Kumar, Vnr Vjiet, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anthony Anggrawan, University of Bumigora, Indonesia.

(2) Ramona Lacurezeanu, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rasha Ali Ahmed Abdelmowla, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ng Tsz Kit, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Pasupuleti Venkata Siva Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Socio-Economic Upliftment of Women JEEViKA Beneficiaries and to Analyse the Constraints Faced by Them in Begusarai District of Bihar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gadisa Worku, Salale University, Ethiopia.

(2) Sudhanand Prasad Lal, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joshua Mugambwa, Makerere University, Uganda.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Gadisa Worku, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sudhanand Prasad Lal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Spacing on Yield and Economics of Varieties of Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, Biology, State University of New York, New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreelavaniya. R, Sri Parasakthi College for Women, India.

(2) Lim Hwee San, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shreelavaniya. R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lim Hwee San, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA