Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed E. El-awadi, NRC, Egypt.

(2) M. V. Sriramachandrasekharan, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aneela Nijabat, Ghazi University, Pakistan.

(2) Mohamed Atef El-Sherpiny, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Sangeeta Madan, Gurukula Kangri (Deemed to be )University, India.

(4) Anil Kumar, India.

(5) G. Venkatesan, M. R. Government Arts College, India.

6) Sarmad Ghazi Al-Shawi, Basrah University, Iraq.

(7) Shimaa El-Sayed Rashad, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(8) S. K. Choudhary, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohamed E. El-awadi, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. V. Sriramachandrasekharan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Nida Tabassum Khan, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences (Buitems), Pakistan.

(3) H.P. Meena, ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bashar Hadi Abdullahi, Shehu Shagari College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Matheus Gomes da Cruz, State University of Amazonas, Brazil.

(3) Mohamed Sayed Hassan, South Valley University, Egypt.

(4) Mohamed Ibrahim El-Meadawy, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage:  8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Annelise Aila Gomes Lobo, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nida Tabassum Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (H.P. Meena, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Camino Escolar-Llamazares, Professor, Psychology in the area of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Burgos, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Tiruveedula Gopi Krishna, Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ismail Ukav, Adiyaman University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khyati Patel, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

(2) Maria Lúcia de Jesus Pato, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu – Agrarian School, Portugal.

(3) Tjatursari Widiartin, Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tiruveedula Gopi Krishna, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ismail Ukav, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chen Chin Chang, Distinguished Professor, Hunan Women’s University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Asia Neelam, Institute of Environmental studies, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Ihab Salah Abd El-Hamid Ashoush, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Xochitl Ruelas-Chacón, Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asia Neelam, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ihab Salah Abd El-Hamid Ashoush, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Professor, ISTA-School of Technology and Architecture, ISCTE-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Dereje Gebeyehu Ababu, Salale University, Ethiopia.

(2) Dharmendra Shanabhai  Mistry, Prin. M C Shah Commerce College, Gujarat University, India.

(3) N. Chandan Babu, Bhavan’s Vivekananda College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aminu Bello Zoramawa, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Nigeria.

(2) Kelachi Precious Enwere, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Waqar Hafeez, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dereje Gebeyehu Ababu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dharmendra Shanabhai Mistry, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (N. Chandan Babu, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. J. Rodolfo Rendón Villalobos, National Polytechnic Institute, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Somenath Ghosh, Jai Prakash University, India.

(2) Prasanta Kumar Mitra, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rosana Canuto Gomes Granja, Brasil.

(2) Isaac John Umaru, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(3) SAVA Parascovia, Institutul Stiintifico-Practic de Horticultura si Tehnologii Alimentare, Republic of Moldova.

(4) Shaik Firoz, Sree Vidyanikethan College of Pharmacy, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Somenath Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prasanta Kumar Mitra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Palanisamy Arulselvan, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) George Omoto, Kenya.

(2) Carlo Artemi, Ministero Pubblica Istruzione, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashraf Mohamed Barakat, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Esen Oruç, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Türkiye.

(3) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon.

(4) Merkine Mogiso, South Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (George Omoto, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Carlo artemi, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ruben Dario Ortiz Ortiz, Professor, Universidad de Cartagena, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Tahmineh Azizi, Florida State University, USA.

(2) Suha Najeeb Shihab, University of Technology, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Behiye Çavuşoğlu, Near East University, North Cyprus.

(2) Chisara P. Ogbogbo, University of Ghana, Ghana.

(3) Masomeh Aghamohamadi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(4) Sobhy El-sayed Ibrahim, Benha University, Egypt.

(5) S. Vidhya, Cauvery College for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tahmineh Azizi, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suha Najeeb Shihab, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Danilo Costarelli, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed A. Hamoud, Taiz university, Yemen.

(2) Muhammad Tanveer, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek S. Rao, VTU, India.

(2) H. A. Batarfi, King Abdulaziz University , Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

(3) Emmanuel Omokhuale, Federal University Gusau, Nigeria.

(4) Jollanda Shara, Univ. “Eqrem Cabej”, Albania.

(5) Mithun Kumar PK, World University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

(6) Peter Y P Chen, University of New South Wales, Australia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmed A. Hamoud, Yemen) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Tanveer, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lwin Mar Hlaing, Ministry of Health, National Unity Government, Myanmar.

(2) Utkarsh Bansal, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Amel Ouyahia, Université de Sétif, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harshal Vinod Basatwar, Maharashtra University of Health Science, India.

(2) Bharti Satish Weljale, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(3) Özlem Üzüm, University of Health Sciences, Turkey.

(4) Paulina Clara Appiah, Ghana Health Service, Ghana.

(5) Rukmani Dewangan, College of Veterinary Science & A. H, India.

(6) Saurabh Kumar, Father Muller Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lwin Mar Hlaing, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Utkarsh Bansal, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amel Ouyahia, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA