Peer Review History: Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Examination Malpractice at the College of Distance Education University of Cape Coast, Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) M. Camino Escolar-Llamazares, Professor, Psychology in the area of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Burgos, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Zainab Hamid, University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Thayer M. Aboush, Alkhansaa Teaching Hospital, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Malgit Amos Akims, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Sri Rejeki Dwi Astuti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

(3) Ya-Ping Hu, Asia University, Taiwan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Zainab Hamid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Thayer M. Aboush, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Applications of Compost and Ca (OH)2 to Overcome Cadmium (Cd) Contamination in Inceptisols

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rusu Teodor, Professor, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Professor, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

(3) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Professor, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehdi Karimi, National Salinity Research Center (NSRC), Iran.

(2) Md. Zulfiker Ali, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amira Mohamed Mohamed Elemshaty, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Shafiul Islam Rion, West Virginia University, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mehdi Karimi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Md. Zulfiker Ali, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antibacterial Activity of Composite Mixture of Senna siamea Leaves and Tamarind Pulp Extracts on Multidrug Resistant Salmonella typhi

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

(2) Dr. Marcello Iriti, Professor, Plant Biology and Pathology, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Maaryam Idris-Usman, London School of Science and Technology, United Kingdom.

(2) Alireza Motavalizadehkakhky, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) D.Gajalakshmi, University College of Engineering Villupuram, India.

(2) Sainta Jostar. T, Sadakathullah  Appa College, India.

(3) Soumia Mouffouk, Batna-1 University, Algeria.

(4) Tripti Malik, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Maaryam Idris-Usman, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alireza Motavalizadehkakhky, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Isolation of Active Molecules from the Stems of Passion Vine

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, College of Business, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Esmael Rostami, Payame Noor University, Iran.

(2) Imtiaj Hossain Chowdhury, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Girigosavi Shravani Vishwas, India.

(2) Tarik Attar, Higher School of Applied Sciences-Tlemcen, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Esmael Rostami, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Imtiaj Hossain Chowdhury, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-economic Important of Beekeeping in Lafia Local Government Area of Nasarawa State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Lecturer, Institute of Business Studies and leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmegid Ahmed Abedo, Naational Ressearch Centre, Egypt.

(2) Morakinyo, Barnabas Ojo, Baze University Abuja, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) T. Amose, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) Zbiri Asmae, University Mohammed V, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdelmegid Ahmed Abedo, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Morakinyo, Barnabas Ojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Returns to Wheat Research, Varietal Adoption and Turnover Rates and Wheat Production Risks in Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Elzaabalawy Mohamed, Agricultural Economics Research Institute, Egypt.

(2) Naveed Hamid, SKUAST, India.

(3) HaithHaitham Nobanee, Abu Dhabi University, UAE.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Bhat, SKUAST, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Elzaabalawy Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Naveed Hamid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (HaithHaitham Nobanee, UAE) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Combination of Compost Derived Poultry Litter and Vivianite Powder: Appropriate Biological Fertilizer to Improve the Growth and Root Yield of Daucus carota L

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moreira Martine Ramon Felipe, Associate Professor, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Muayed Fadhil Abbas, Basrah University College of Agriculture, Iraq.

(2) Hudhaifa Maan AL-Hamandi, Tikrit University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhia Ahmed Taain, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.75/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Muayed Fadhil Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hudhaifa Maan AL-Hamandi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of IOT Based Digital Display Board for Students’ Lectures Update

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Professor, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

(3) Dr. Hamdy Mohy El-Din Afefy, Professor, Tanta University, Smouha, Alexandria, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Anitha Vijayalakshmi, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, India.

(2) Somdotta Roy Choudhury, Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Yang Yang, Institute of Intelligent Engineering, Nanjing City Vocational College, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G. Senthil Kumar, SCSVMV Deemed University, India.

(2) Anusha R, NMAM Institute of Technology, India.

(3) K Srinivasa Rao, JNTUH-MRIT, India.

(4) Ragib Shakil Rafi, University of Kansas, USA and Khulna University, Bangladesh.

(5) Vanita Mane, University of Mumbai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.03/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anitha Vijayalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Somdotta Roy Choudhury, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Yang Yang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Fecal Biomarker for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rui Yu, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Chibao Huang, Zunyi Normal University, China.

(2) Maria Paparoupa, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniela Miricescu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

(2) Naveenvairamoorthy Dakshinamoorthy, ESI-PGIMSR and ESIC Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Chibao Huang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria Paparoupa, Germany) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study of Soluble CD52 as a Tumor Marker and Indicator of Disease Activity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sevgul Donmez, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Magesh, King Institute of Preventive Medicine and Research, India.

(2) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad – College of Nursing, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S. Magesh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Haider Mohammed Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA