Peer Review History: Treatment of Pulmonary Edema in Severe Preeclampsia during Pandemic

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Professor, Zagazig University, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Eghon Guzman B, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Santiago, Chile.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharti Satish Weljale, Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Mamta, DMCH, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bharti Satish Weljale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mamta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


 

 

Peer Review History: Giant Cell Tumour of Lower End of Tibia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

(2) Dr. Yasushi Shibata, Professor, Mito Medical Center, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

(3) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Genaral Surgery, Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Vikash Raj, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Deoghar, India.

(2) Rares Mircea Birlutiu, Foisor Clinical Orthopaedic Hospital Bucharest, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vikash Raj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rares Mircea Birlutiu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Evaluation the Genetic Variability and Association Analysis of Soybean (Glycine max (l.) Merrill for Some Physiological Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Nihar Ranjan Chakraborty, Visva-Bharati West Bengal, India.

(2) Dina Yousif Mohammed Yousif, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Franklin Santos, Universidad Pública de El Alto, Bolivia.

(3) Haleemah Jabbar Al-Aradi, University of Basrah College of Agriculture, Iraq.

(4) Mohammed M. Abdel Hamed Ali, Zagazig University, Egypt.

(5) Niraj Tripathi, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(6) Suravoot yooyongwech, Mahidol University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nihar Ranjan Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dina Yousif Mohammed Yousif, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Impact Assessment on Attainment of Social Status by MGNREGA Beneficiaries in Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) E. Sathyapriya, AMRITA School of Agricultural Science, AMRITA University, Coimbatore.

(2) Xingsi Xue, Fujian University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) E. Sathyapriya, Amrita University, India.

(2) Tolulope Olatoye, University of Fort Hare, South Africa.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (E. Sathyapriya, Coimbatore) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Xingsi Xue, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Steady Flow of Blood Plasma through a Non-deformed Artery

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Metin Basarir, Professor, Sakarya University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Ibrahim Latif, University of Diyala College of Medicine, Iraq.

(2) Jaime Moises Horta Rangel, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Mexico.

(3) Tajani Chakir, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ismail Ibrahim Latif, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jaime Moises Horta Rangel, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Tajani Chakir, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Carrot Harvesting Methods: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, Alqasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Federico Hahn, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Parmar Raghuvirsinh, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Subrata Kumar Mandal, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Federico Hahn, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: The Use of Information and Communication Technology to Teach: Assessment of Secondary School Students’ Perceptions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Anand Jayant Mayee, Pacific Academy of Higher Education & Research University Udaipur, India.

(2) Meenaksh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.S.Suryateja, Vishnu Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Regina Esi Turkson, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

(3) Shweta Gupta, Jain University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anand Jayant Mayee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Meenakshi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Perception of Junior Doctors and Nurses towards the COVID-19 Disease in a Tertiary Care Centre in North India- A Questionnaire Based Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ana María Arnáiz García, Hospital Sierrallana, Spain.

(2) Noha Ahmed Mohamed Hassan, Beni-Suef University, Egypt.

(3) Maria Mesquita, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.75/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ana María Arnáiz García, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Noha Ahmed Mohamed Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria Mesquita, Belgium) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Sciatica and Urinary Incontinence – Longitudinal for 12 Weeks Evidenced Research with Physiotherapy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Essa, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Tejinder Kaur, Panjab University, India.

(2) Wei-Chih Lien, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Taiwan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tejinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Wei-Chih Lien, Taiwan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Eisenia fetida Squirms Biased Bioremediation of Pyrene and Indeno(1, 2, 3–cd)Pyrene Soil and Petroleum Wastewater Contamination

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rodolfo Dufo Lopez, Professor, University of Zaragoza, Spain.

(2) Dr. Teresa De Pilli, Assistant Professor, University of Foggia, Via Napoli, Italy.

(3) Dr. Nhamo Nhamo, Associate Professor, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe.

Reviewers:

(1) Ortansa Csutak, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Cleide Barbieri de Souza, Lusíada University Center – UNILUS, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ortansa Csutak, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cleide Barbieri de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA