Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Syed Mubashar Sabir, University of Poonch, Pakistan.

(2) Farah Jalaly, Madhaya Pradesh Medical Science University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Brajesh Pandey, Symbiosis Institute of Technology, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Syed Mubashar Sabir, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farah Jalaly, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Eltayib Hassan Ahmed-Abakur, Tabuk University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Ghulam Saqulain, Capital Hospital PGMI Islamabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eltayib Hassan Ahmed-Abakur, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ghulam Saqulain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Panagiotis Tsikripis, University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandip Meghnad Hulke, All India Institute of Medical Science Bhopal, India.

(2) Rl Sharma, Himachal Pradesh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sandip Meghnad Hulke, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rl Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Noha Fathy Omar, Damietta University, Egypt.

(2) Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, Universitatea „Ovidius” din Constanța, Romania.

(3) Maria de Sousa Brito Neta, Universidade de Brasilia-UnB, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Noha Fathy Omar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria de Sousa Brito Neta, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.

Reviewers:

(1) Demeke Mekonnen, Splash International Ethiopia Office, Ethiopia.

(2) Jurandyr Santos Nogueira, Polytechnic School – Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahmood Hasan Khan, United Hospital Limited, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Demeke Mekonnen, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jurandyr Santos Nogueira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Fernando Raphael de Almeida Ferry, Federal University of The State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

(2) Ifeoma Priscilla Ezeugwunne, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(3) Amalia Stefaniu, National Institute for Chemical – Pharmaceutical Research and Development (ICCF), Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fernando Raphael de Almeida Ferry, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ifeoma Priscilla Ezeugwunne, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Amalia Stefaniu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Doina Bein, Professor, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramya S, Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital, India.

(2) Mudasir M. Kirmani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, India.

(3) Soubhik Chakraborty, Birla Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.33/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ramya S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mudasir M. Kirmani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Soubhik Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Eghon Guzman B, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Santiago, Chile.

Reviewers:

(1) Girum Tefera Belachew, Debre Birhan University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ne Win, University of Medicine-1, Myanmar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mahima Jain, BJ Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Girum Tefera Belachew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ne Win, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Al-kazafy Hassan Sabry, Professor, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Hassan  A. Ennab, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Ajay Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Foestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghassan Jayed Zaidan, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(2) Manish Kumar, India.

(3) Mohamed Arba, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, Morocco.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hassan A. Ennab, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ajay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Professor of Economics, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Mohamed Ismail Mohamed, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Universidade Paulista – UNIP, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asmaa Mohamed Ismail Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA