Peer Review History: Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Performance: Study on the Effectiveness of Training among Nurses in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Karachi

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucia Tobase, Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo.

(2) Piacentini Alberto, Istituto Mediterraneo Trapianti (Ismett), Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Claudia Maria de Freitas Floriano, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Lucia Tobase, São Paulo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Piacentini Alberto, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparative Contact Angle Analysis of 1% Chlorhexidine and 2% Metronidazole Mouthgel – An In Vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Girish Suragimath, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences “Deemed To Be University”, India.

(2) Kemal Gokhan Nalbant, Beykent University, Turkey.

(3) Muhammad Salman Chishty, Saudi Arabia.

(4) Esshagh Lasemi, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Isabel Azcurra, Universidad Nacional De Córdoba, Argentina.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Girish Suragimath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kemal Gokhan Nalbant, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Muhammad Salman Chishty, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Esshagh Lasemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Nanobiotechnology and its Application in Vaccine Delivery

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Thomas F. George, Retired Chancellor / Professor, University of Missouri- St. Louis One University Boulevard St. Louis, USA.

(2) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

(3) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien,  Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Djefaflia Rabiaa, Scientific and Technical Research Center in Physicochemical Analysis (CRAPC), Algeria.

(2) Ramin Farhoudi, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdulrasheed Dalhatu, Aminu Saleh College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Dewa Putu Wisnu Wardhana, Universitas Udayana, Indonesia.

(3) Fatemeh Ghani Dehkordi, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(4) M Arunkumar, PSG College of Arts and Science, India.

(5) Muhammad Irfan Bashir, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

(6) Shalabh Gupta, Santosh Deemed to be University, India.

(7) Syed Suhail Hamdani, University of Kashmir, India.

(8) Van-An Duong, Gachon University, South Korea.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Djefaflia Rabiaa, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ramin Farhoudi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Determining the Impact of Coronavirus (COVID 19) on General Surgical Practice in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

(2) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Jay K Sheth, AMC MET Medical College, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Sanjay Kumar Dabhi, VNSGU ( Veer Narmad South Gujarat University), India.

(3) Osman Imamoğlu, Ondokuz Mayıs Universty, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jay K Sheth, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sanjay Kumar Dabhi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Osman Imamoğlu, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Cross-sectional Study on the Development of Diabetic Cardiovascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in a South Indian Tertiary Care Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Mubashir zafar, Ziauddin University, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Kashif Munir, King Edward Medical University Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Yasir Haider Al-Mawlah, University of Babylon, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Chittrarasu, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Vivekanandha Dental College for Women, India.

(2) Mirza Tasawer Baig, Ziauddin University, Pakistan.

(3) Rejwan Ahmed Choudhury, Assam Down Town University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mubashir zafar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Kashif Munir, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Yasir Haider Al-Mawlah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Phytochemistry and Antimicrobial Activities of Crude and Diluted Leaves and Roots Extracts of Uvaria chamae on Selected Bacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Faouzi Laachari, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco.

(2) Nishtha, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pauline Sharmila, SGT University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Faouzi Laachari, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nishtha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Frequency of Renal Involvement in Patients of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dharmesh Chandra Sharma, Incharge Blood Bank, Component & Aphaeresis Uni, G. R. Medical College & J. A. Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(2) Gliga Mirela Liana, UMFST George Emil Palade Tg Mures, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gliga Mirela Liana, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Evaluation and Quantification of Resistant Gene in Antibiotic Resistant ESBL Producing E. coli in UTI Samples with Diabetes Mellitus: A Molecular Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Amin Dehghan, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Abhishek Chowdhury, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amin Dehghan, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abhishek Chowdhury, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Mediterranean Diet and Metformin Effects on Gestational Diabetes: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R. Deveswaran, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Claudio Mascheroni, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina.

(2) Edson José de Carvalho Magacho, Juiz de Fora – Suprema, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Laura Andrea Huidobro, Universidad Católica del Maule, Chile.

(2) Miljana Z Jovandaric, University Clinical Centre of Serbia, Serbia.

(3) Sônia Maria de Figueiredo, Escola de Nutriçõ, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Brazil.

(4) Suzana Maria Ramos Costa, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Claudio Mascheroni, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Edson José de Carvalho Magacho, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Antibacterial Screening and Analysis of Streptomyces coelicolor Secondary Metabolites

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumitha Gopalakrishnan, Calicut University, India.

(2) Teresita Sainz-Espuñes, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) AV Narasimha Swamy, JNTU, India.

(2) Bernard Otieno Sadia, Moi University, Kenya.

(3) Cássio Ilan Soares Medeiros, UNIFIP University Center, Brazil.

(4) Jeferson Júnior da Silva, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas – UNICAMP, Brazil.

(5) Lencho Megersa Marami, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sumitha Gopalakrishnan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Teresita Sainz-Espuñes, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA