Peer Review History: Ease of Care Giving for Children: Parent Perceptions of the Physical Demands of Care Giving for Children with Cerebral Palsy in Indian Context

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Prem K. Ramasamy, Brandeis University, Greater Boston Area,  USA

Reviewers:

(1) Surjeet Sahoo, Ims & Sum Hospital. S’o’a University, India.

(2) Kamal Saini, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Surjeet Sahoo, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kamal Saini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis with Traditional Chinese Medicine Gushukang

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Raj AC, Radiology Pondicherry Central University, India.

(2) Neeraj Kant Agrawal, Banaras Hindu University, India.

(3) Teo Shyh Poh, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hospital, Brunei.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raj AC, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Neeraj Kant Agrawal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Teo Shyh Poh, Brunei) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effect of Tillage and Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economics of Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Subrota Kumer Pramanik, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Dominic Kwadwo Anning, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) James Gimase, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Subrota Kumer Pramanik, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dominic Kwadwo Anning, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effect of Nitrogen and Silica on Growth and Yield of Paddy (Oryza sativa L.) Variety CO 51

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Majid Khayatnezhad, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Birendra Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University,  India.

(3) Jamshad hussain, Pakistan.

(4) Shaikh Yasmeen, Dr. Rafiq Zakaria College For Women Aurangabad (M.S,), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fopoussi Tuebue Jean Christophe, Jesus and Mary Secondary High School, Cameroon.

(2) Haresh S. Kalasariya, Sankalchand Patel University, India.

(3) Kwaku Onwona-Hwesofour Asante, Agency for Health and Food Security, Ghana.

(4) Marcos Adrián Ruiz-Medina, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain.

(5) Md. Zonayet, Khulna Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(6) Muhammad Azka, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Indonesia.

(7) Ndeh, Aniebiet Bassey, Cac Grammar School, Ede, Nigeria.

(8) S D Dubey, C S A Univ of Ag & Tech Kanpur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Majid Khayatnezhad, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Birendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jamshad hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Shaikh Yasmeen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Genomic-Assisted Breeding Tools for Grain and Nutritional Quality Improvement in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhad Hariri Akbari, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.

(2) Ayan Chatterjee, Rishihood University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anjana Rustagi, Gargi College (University of Delhi), India.

(2) Dennis Owusu Boateng, Ghana.

(3) Naú Silverio Niño Gutiérrez, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Mexico.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Farhad Hariri Akbari, Slovenia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ayan Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Determination of Insecticidal Potential of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) Lectin through Bio-computational Tools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, the University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaimaa Hassan Negm, Port Said University, Egypt.

(2) Suhair  M. Yaseen, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shaimaa Hassan Negm, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Suhair  M. Yaseen, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Double Vena Cava in Hemorrhagic Polycystic Kidney Disease Patient

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pandiaraja. J, Shree Devi Hospital, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Varuni Tennakoon, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka.

(2) Kavvadas Dimitrios, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hiteshkumar M.Chauhan, Government Medical College, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University, India.

(2) Ch. Tri Nuryana, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Varuni Tennakoon, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kavvadas Dimitrios, Greece) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Is Spermatic Cord Torsion Exclusively an Adolescent Emergency?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sherif Salah Azab, October 6 University, Egypt.

(2) Naser Sabah Hussein, Al Karamh Teaching Hospital, Iraq

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sherif Salah Azab, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Naser Sabah Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Analytical Groundwater Quality Assessment for Drinking and Agriculture Purposes in Al-Jouf Region, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Dinesh Kumar Sinha, K.G.K. (P.G.) College, India.

(2) Islam Ul Haque, Pakistan.

(3) Ajay Kumar Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abel Nsabimana, Chang’an University, China.

(2) Balaji Etikala, Sri Venkateswara University, India.

(3) Mandadapu.S.V.K.V.Prasad, Swarnandhra College of Engineering & Technology, India.

(4) Misbah Fida, Chang’an University, China.

(5) R.Premsudha, TKR College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(6) Nitin  Mishra, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Dinesh Kumar Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Islam Ul Haque, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ajay Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Superior Mesenteric Artery Thrombosis in COVID-19 Patient

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Jose Francisco de Sales Chagas, Sao Leopoldo Mandic Medical School, Brasil.

(3) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Hamad Saleh, Al-Qalam University, Iraq.

(2) Soraya Shahrokk, Shahid Beheshti Medical Univercity, Iran.

(3) Choua Ouchemi, University of N’djamena, Chad.

(4) Rwoof A Reshi, University of Oklahoma, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shruti Mehta, Insitute of Kidney Disease and Research Center, India.

(2) Archana B, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ahmed Hamad Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Soraya Shahrokk, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Choua Ouchemi, Chad) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Rwoof A Reshi, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA