Peer Review History: A Critical Review on Concept of Adjuvant

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Professor, UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science,  California,  USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Pallavi Bhange, SSAM, India.

(2) Santosh Gulabrao Chavhan, School of Ayurveda D Y Patil Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Sandeep V. Binorkar, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pallavi Bhange, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Santosh Gulabrao Chavhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sandeep V. Binorkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Inevitable Impact of Steroids and Mucormycosis – A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim,  Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bedanta Bhattacharjee, Tripura University (A Central University), India.

(2) Bedanta Bhattacharjee, Girijananda Chowdhury Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, India.

(3) Marwa Mahmoud Abdelrady, Assuit University, Egypt.

(4) Alakesh Bharali, Girijananda Chowdhury Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bedanta Bhattacharjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marwa Mahmoud Abdelrady, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alakesh Bharali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: The Ayurvedic Concept of Kshavathu as Related with Western Concept of Allergic Rhinitis – A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Celso Eduardo Olivier, Instituto Alergoimuno de Americana (Americana’s Allergy and Immunology Institute), Brazil.

(2) Danny Faturachman, Darma Persada University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Danny Faturachman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Celso Eduardo Olivier, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Phytoconstituents and Medicinal Importance of Cannabis sativa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Professor and Researcher, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Alqarni, College of Pharmacy, Taif University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Marcelo Barcellos da Rosa, Federal university of Santa Maria, Brazil.

(3) Rosa Elva Norma del Río Torrres, Universidad Michooacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gurumtet Istifanus, University of Jos, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage8.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mohammed Alqarni, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marcelo Barcellos da Rosa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Rosa Elva Norma del Río Torrres, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: An Evaluation of the POSSUM Score’s Efficacy in Predicting the Outcome of Patients Undergoing a Laparotomy – A Study Protocol

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Inamullah Shah, Foundation University Islamabad, Pakistan.

(2) Randy McCool, Northwest Community Hospital, USA.

(3) Juan Antonio Lugo Machado, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social -Universidad de Sonora, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ferdinando Agresta, Italy.

(2) Zeynep Günay Uçmak, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Inamullah Shah, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Randy McCool, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Juan Antonio Lugo Machado, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Awareness about the Benefits of Indoor Plants: Reduction in Stress Level and Mental Health Satisfaction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Nuri Öner, Çankırı Karatekin University, Çankırı / Turkey.

(2) Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, National Research Center, Egypt.

(3) U.V.Singh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.46/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nuri Öner, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (U.V.Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Tongue Reconstruction by Nasolabial Flap

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Belmaati Cherkaoui ghita, Mohamed IV Hospital University, Mohammed I university, Morocco.

(2) Glenda Giorgia Caputo, University Hospital of Udine, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Belmaati Cherkaoui ghita, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Glenda Giorgia Caputo, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Factors Associated with Delayed Presentation among Women with Breast Cancer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Firoj A. Tamboli, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Victor Manuel Vargas-Hernandez, Academia Mexicana De Cirugia/Academia Nacional De Medicna De Mexico/Hospital Juarez De Mexico, Mexico.

(3) Mahmoud Mohamad Hallal, Lebanese university, Lebanon.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Firoj A. Tamboli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Victor Manuel Vargas-Hernandez, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mahmoud Mohamad Hallal, Lebanon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of the Influence of Single Preoperative Antibiotic Dose of Amoxicillin (1gm) and Postoperative Antibiotic Dose of Amoxicillin Drug (500mg) Regimen on Postoperative Outcome and Implant Stability in Single Tooth Dental Implant Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Agenor Gomes Dos Santos-Neto, Tiradentes University, Brazil.

(2) Zbigniew Raszewski, Spofa Dental, Czech Rep.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Najim Z. Alshahrani, University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Agenor Gomes Dos Santos-Neto, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zbigniew Raszewski, Czech Rep) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Association of Depression with Polypharmacy among Diabetic Patients of Geriatric Age Group in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giulio Tarro, Professor & President, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Napoli, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Diana Paleacu Kertesz, Abarbanel Mental Health Center, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

(2) Jian Li, The Third Hospital of Mianyang, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Diana Paleacu Kertesz, Israel) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Jian Li, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA