Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Category Archives: Review History
Peer Review History: Evaluation of Cardioprotective action of Suvarna gairik (Redochre) in Indian Cobra Envenomation, Aluminium Phosphide Poisoning and Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in Albino Rats- A Protocol
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.
Reviewers:
(1) Waleska Dos Santos, Federal University of Sergipe, Brazil.
(2) S. Vidyadhara, Chebrolu Hanumaiah Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Abdeldayem Zakaria, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Waleska Dos Santos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (S. Vidyadhara, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: In- vitro Hepatoprotective Action of the Crude Extracts of Luffa amara (Whole Fruit) and Rheum emodi (Rhizomes) in CCl4 Intoxicated Rat Hepatocytes
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.
Reviewers:
(1) Nazish Mazhar Ali, Government College University Lahore, Pakistan.
(2) Hamdy M. A. Hassanein, Sohag University, Egypt.
Additional Reviewers:
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nazish Mazhar Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hamdy M. A. Hassanein, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: A Descriptive Study on Hematological Changes in Brucellosis Infected Individuals
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Dharmesh Chandra Sharma, ABTO ( Associate Blood Transfusion Officer), Incharge Blood Bank, Component & Aphaeresis Uni, G. R. Medical College & J. A. Hospital, Gwalior India.
Reviewers:
(1) Teerasak Chuxnum, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.
(2) Yohannes Hailemichael Jatana, Assosa University , Ethiopia.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Vivek Agrawal, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, India.
(2) Rajendra Kumar Jangde, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, India.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Teerasak Chuxnum, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yohannes Hailemichael Jatana, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Perception of Dental Students towards the usage of Online Assessment during COVID -19 Pandemic
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
(2) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Assistant Professor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia.
Reviewers:
(1) Anthony Anggrawam, Bumigora University, Indonesia.
(2) Leili Mohammadi, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
(3) Dilshi Ishaan, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Merdaci Slimane, University Djillali Liabès of Sidi Bel Abbés, Algeria.
(2) Bhuvaneshwari NG, Y.M.T Dental college and hospital, India.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Anthony Anggrawam, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Leili Mohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Dilshi Ishaan, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: On the Convergence and Stability of Finite Difference Method for Parabolic Partial Dierential Equations
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.
Reviewers:
(1) Sudhanshu Aggarwal, National P.G. College Barhalganj Gorakhpur, India.
(2) P. Chandra Reddy, Annamacharya Institute Of Technology And Sciences, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Atanaska T. Georgieva, University of Plovdiv ”Paisii Hilendarski, Bulgaria.
(2) Emad A. Az-Zo’bi, Mutah University, Jordan.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sudhanshu Aggarwal, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (P. Chandra Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Methods for Deriving Linearly Independent Solutions of the Differential Equation with Repeated Roots
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Doina Bein, Applied Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.
Reviewers:
(1) Adeoye, Adebola Samuel, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.
(2) Adebisi Sunday Adesina, University of Lagos, Nigeria.
(3) H.P. Rani, National Institute of Technology, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Louis Omenyi, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Nigeria.
(2) Basel M. Al-Eideh, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
(3) Francisco J. Solis, Mexico.
(4) L. Rajendran, AMET University, India.
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Adeoye, Adebola Samuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Adebisi Sunday Adesina, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (H.P. Rani, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Case Report on Ebstein Anomaly
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh
Reviewers:
(1) Ankan Kumar Paul, Barts Health NHS Trust, UK.
(2) Romeu Paulo Martins Silva, Federal University of Catalão, Brazil.
(3) Biswajit Majumder, West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ankan Kumar Paul, UK) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Romeu Paulo Martins Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Biswajit Majumder, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Lights and Shadows of Rituximab in Dermatology
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, México.
Reviewers:
(1) Eugene Wilson, India.
(2) Sunil Kumar, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, India.
(3) Hanan L. Al-Omary, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
Additional Reviewers:
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Eugene Wilson, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Hanan L. Al-Omary, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Assessing the Roadblocks to Organ Donation
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.
Reviewers:
(1) Somdatta Patra , Delhi University, India.
(2) Vijayanand Palaniswamy , Australia
(3) Mukesh Kumar, All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Somdatta Patra, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Vijayanand Palaniswamy, Australia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mukesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA