Peer Review History: Study to Find the Effect in Combined Protocol of Aquatic Therapy and Play Therapy in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder in School Going Children from 7 – 10 Years to Improve the Quality of Life

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Vandana Chauhan, Himalayan College of Nursing, Swami Rama Himalayan University, India

(2) Luciana Fernández Moretti , Instituto Río Psicología, Spain.

 

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vandana Chauhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luciana Fernández Moretti, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Protocol RCT on Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Prakriti (Unique Constitution) Based Pathya-Apathya with Routine Diet in Healthy Children to Evaluate Its Future Observation towards Diseases to Prevent and Treat Morbidities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Pundareekaksha Rao, Ayurveda college Coimbatore,The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, India.

(2) Mrinmayee Hedaoo, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University, India.

(3) Sujit Kumar Dalai, RK Institute of Ayurvedic Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mrudul Y.Chitrakar, .Y.Patil University, School of Ayurveda, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pundareekaksha Rao, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mrinmayee Hedaoo, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sujit Kumar Dalai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Dog Bite Patients and their Attendants Visiting Jinnah Post Graduate Medical Centre – A Tertiary Care Hospital in Karachi

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, University of Texas, College of Pharmacy, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagajyothi, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India.

(2) Luu Thi  Lan Anh, School of Engineering Physics, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jasmina Debeljak Martacic, Serbia.

(2) Qudrat Ullah, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nagajyothi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Luu Thi  Lan Anh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparison of Root End Sealing Ability of Three Retrograde Filling Materials in Teeth with Root Apices Resected at 90° using Dye Penetration Method under Fluorescent Microscope: An In-vitro Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Marcelo Victor Coelho Marques, Faculdade adventista da Bahia (FADBA), Brazil.

(2) Francisco Correia, University of Oporto, Faculdade de Medicina Dentaria, Portugal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Maedeh Ghorbanpour, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Marcelo Victor Coelho Marques, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Francisco Correia, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Acute Pulmonary Embolism Post COVID-19 Pneumonia – A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Professor,UCLA School of Medicine & Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

(2) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebru Derici Eker, Mersin University, Turkey.

(2) Hesham Rashid Mousa, Benha University, Egypt.

(3) Kanterpersad Ramcharan, SurgiMed Clinic, Trinidad and Tobago.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K V Vinu Balraam, Armed Forces Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ebru Derici Eker, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hesham Rashid Mousa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Kanterpersad Ramcharan, Trinidad and Tobago) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Causes of Death in COVID-19: A Minireview

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, Clinical Immunology Unit, University of Genoa, Italy.

(2) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Arifa Khatoon, Indus Hospital, India.

(2) Emmanuel Kyame Oppong, University of Education, Ghana.

(3) Chen Yunzhi Guizhou, University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

 Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.116/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: /10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Arifa Khatoon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Emmanuel Kyame Oppong, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Chen Yunzhi Guizhou, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Role of Hepatic and Renal Profile in the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sachin Kumar Jain, Associate Professor, IPS Academy College of Pharmacy, India

Reviewers:

(1) Ghitea Timea Claudia, University of Oradea, Romania

(2) Chibao Huang, School of Information Engineering, Zunyi Normal University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ghitea Timea Claudia, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Chibao Huang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Risk Factors Which Lead to Development of Senile Cataract: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Efeoghene Ani, Madonna University Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Meera Alias Devasena, Sri Ramachandra Medical College & Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Efeoghene Ani, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Meera Alias Devasena, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Cross Sectional Study on Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Exclusive Breast Feeding among Women of Reproductive Age Group in Chennai, Tamil Nadu

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Jesusa v. Gutierrez, University Of Tabuk, KSA.

(2) Neriman Zengin, University of Health Science Turkey, Turkey.

(3) Abirbhab Pal, West Bengal university of health sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jesusa v. Gutierrez, KSA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Neriman Zengin, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Abirbhab Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Pathways of Renal Involvement in COVID-19 Infection

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Salem Nasr Allah, Assistant Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College, Qatar.

(2) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Tajamul Islam, University of Kashmir,  India.

(2) Ricardo Gobato, Brazil.

(3) Monika Panchani, SVP Cluster University Mandi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anis A. B. Choudhery , G.M.M.Women’s College – University of Mumbai , India.

(2) Nandkishor B. Shirsath, M.S. G. College Malegaon Camp, SSPU Pune University, India.

(3) Ismail Rabiu, Skyline University Nigeria, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tajamul Islam,India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ricardo Gobato, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Monika Panchani, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA