Peer Review History: A Phonological-Pragmatic Analysis of the Saudi Ministry of Health Official Spokesperson’s Speech on COVID-19

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Atila Yildirim, Necmettin Erbakan University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Albashir Mohammed Alhaj, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Maman Lesmana, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.

(3) Sankar. G, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(4) Odingowei M. Kwokwo, Niger Delta University, Nigeria.

(5) Bahaa-Eddin M. Mazid, Sohag University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alemayehu Wochato Laiso, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Tsai-Fa(TF) Yen, Guangzhou College of Technology and Business, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ali Albashir Mohammed Alhaj, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maman Lesmana, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sankar.G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Odingowei M. Kwokwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Bahaa-Eddin M. Mazid, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Prevalence of Malaria and the Use of Long-lasting Insecticide Treated Bed Nets in Households of Rural and Semi-urban Communities in Mbengwi Health District, North West Region, Cameroon

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wei Wang, Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases, China.

Reviewers:

(1) I.P Sunish, ICMR- Regional Medical Research Centre, India.

(2) Abiodun Obembe, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (I.P Sunish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abiodun Obembe, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development & Validation of RP-HPLC Method for the Estimation of Doravirine in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ch Narasaimha Raju Bh, Vagdevi College Of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Sebaey Mahgoub, Children’s Cancer Hospital, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krishnaphanisri P, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad, India.

(2) Monika L. Jadhav, S.N.D.T. Women’s University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ch Narasaimha Raju Bh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sebaey Mahgoub, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Profoundly Touchy Approved Spectrofluorimetric Approach for Assurance of Ixabepilone as Anticancer Drug by Utilizing Its Quenching Impact on Acetoxymercuric Fluorescein Reagent

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bengi Uslu, Ankara University, Ankara-Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Suresh Kumar Karri, Vellore Institute Of Technology, India.

(2) R Naga Kishore, Geethanjali College Of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Suresh Kumar Karri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (R Naga Kishore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: The Magnitude and Risk Factors of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome among Newborn Admitted To Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Benghazi Medical Center

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veeramuthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed, Egypt.

(2) Maria Márquez Riquel, National Polytechnic Experimental University Of The Armed Forces (UNEFA), Venezuela.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Yasser Mohammed Hassanain Elsayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Maria Márquez Riquel, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Prevalence of Depression in Medical Staff in KSA: Cross Sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Margarita Bakracheva, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria.

(2) Mubashir Zafar, Ziauddin University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Waqar Husain, COMSATS Islamabad, Pakistan.

(2) Abdul Moiz Sahito, Dow Medical College, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Margarita Bakracheva, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mubashir Zafar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Anthropometric Evaluation of Volume of Maxillary Sinus and Nasal Septum Patterns as an AID in Personal Identification Using CBCT-A Retrospective Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Labafchi, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Nang Khin Mya, University Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Patil, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Sahar Youssef, AI-Azhar University, Egypt.

(3) Abhishek Banerjee, Awadh Dental College Hospital, India.

(4) Sávio Morato de Lacerda Gontijo, UNA – Bom Despacho, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ali Labafchi, Iran) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nang Khin Mya, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Knowledge and Awareness about Obesity Complications in Pregnancy among Reproductive Women

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Nova Southeastern University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sabina Khanam, Yobe State University, Nigeria.

(2) Iurie Dondiuc, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sabina Khanam, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Iurie Dondiuc, Republic of Moldova) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Antioxidant and Xanthine Oxidase Inhibitory Potential of Methanolic Leaf Extract of Stevia rebaudiana

Editor(s):

(1)  Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Neelam  , North Eastern Institute of Ayurveda and Homeopathy, India.

(2) Mohammad Abu Taher , Hamdard University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

(3) Kateryna Semchenko , National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lydia Bonareri Nyamwamu, Moi University, Kenya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Neelam, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mohammad Abu Taher, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Kateryna Semchenko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effectiveness of Chilled Cabbage Leaves Versus Hot Application on Breast Engorgement among Postnatal Mothers in Selected Hospitals of Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Metropolitan Autonomous University Iztapalapa Campus, México.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Linda Varghese, Amrita College of Nursing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.

(2) Esra Karataş Okyay, Inonu University, Turkey.

(3) Jayendra Gohil, Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnagar University, India.

(4) Sandra Hipólito Cavalcanti, The Pernambuco College of Health, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Linda Varghese, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Esra Karataş Okyay, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Jayendra Gohil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Sandra Hipólito Cavalcanti, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA