Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Pietro Russo, Italy.

(2) Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Pietro Russo, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Essam Samir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveenlal Kuttichira, Deakin University, Australia.

(2) Biswadip Ghosh, The West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lili Husniati Yaacob, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Praveenlal Kuttichira, Australia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Biswadip Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Orlando Manuel da Costa Gomes, Professor of Economics, Lisbon Accounting and Business School (ISCAL), Lisbon Polytechnic Institute, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Akhmad Endang Zainal Hasan, IPB University, Indonesia.

(2) Abraha Gebregewergis Weldehawaria, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ladislav Bláha,  Crop Research Institute, Czech Republic.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Akhmad Endang Zainal Hasan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Abraha Gebregewergis Weldehawaria, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fagbadebo Omololu Michael, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(2) Dr. Azizur Rahman, University of Toronto, Canada.

(3) Dr. Shu-Lung Kuo, Kelee Environmental Consultant Corporation, Taiwan and The Open University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanguida. A, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Costantino Caroselli, The National Institute for the Care of the Elderly, Italy.

(3) Erasmo Orrantia Borunda, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, México.

(4) Supraja N, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(5) Azura Mohd Noor, Institute for Medical Research Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Sanguida. A, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Costantino Caroselli, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Erasmo Orrantia Borunda, México) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Supraja N, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Azura Mohd Noor, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Al-kazafy Hassan Sabry, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Barlin Orlando Olivares, University of Cordoba, Spain.

(2) Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Universidade Paulista – UNIP, Brazil.

(3) Sami Ali Metwally Agricultural and Biological Institute, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Barlin Orlando Olivares, Spain) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Marco Antonio Campos Benvenga, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Sami Ali Metwally, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Shehzad, The University of Poonch Rawalakot, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nooruldeen Shawqi Ali, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Deepika Trehan, ICMR-National Institue of Pathology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sanjukta  Biswas, University of AgriculturalScinces, India.

(2) Aiman Zafar, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Nooruldeen Shawqi Ali, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Deepika Trehan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. David Kitara Lagoro, Gulu University, Uganda.

(2) Dr. Eghon Guzman B, Hospital Dr. Sotero del Rio, Chile.

(3) Dr. Abdelmonem Awad M. Hegazy, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ritika Malviya, Mallareddy Medical College For Women, India.

(2) Madhukar Shinde, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, India.

(3) Rohitha C, All India Institute Of Medical Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ritika Malviya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Madhukar Shinde, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 ((Rohitha C, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nishant Kumar National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Mahboob Hossain, BRAC University, Bangladesh.

(2) Tamer El Sisy, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 ((Mohammed Mahboob Hossain, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Tamer El Sisy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ridzwan Che Rus, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Fábio Henrique Ferreira de Albuquerque, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Pavlo Hryhoruk, Khmelnytskyi National University, Ukraine.

(3) Maria-Daniela Bondoc, University of Pitesti, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hindatu A Bako, Federal College of Education Technical Potiskum, Nigeria.

(2) David Kwashie Garr, Presbyterian University College,Ghana.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fábio Henrique Ferreira de Albuquerque, Portugal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pavlo Hryhoruk, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria-Daniela Bondoc, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Bushra Jasim Mohammed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Mikaïla Kaboré, Regional Hospital of Ziniaré, Ziniaré, Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bushra Jasim Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Mikaïla Kaboré, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA