Peer Review History: Rational Prescription Pattern of Antibiotics: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital (KYAMCH), Sirajganj, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, Hengelo, Netherlands.

Reviewers:

(1) Fauna Herawati, Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia.

(2) Puja, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Brigadier Jeevan R Galagali, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fauna Herawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Puja, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Medecine and Literature: A Reading of Disease in Ayi Kwei Armah’s the Healers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Takalani Samuel Mashau, School of Education, University of Venda, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Santhana Lakshmi. K, SRM Institute Of Science And Technology, India.

(2) Danvas Mabeya, Southeast Community College, United States.

(3) Mohammed Usman, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University Lapai, Nigeria.

(4) Gian Piero Turchi, University Of Padua, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Santhana Lakshmi. K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Danvas Mabeya, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mohammed Usman, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Gian Piero Turchi, Italy) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effects of Anti-Sickling Polyherbal Mixture on Haematological Indices in Normal and Anaemia-Induced Rabbits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Adlina Binti Suleiman, National Defence University Of Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Wagaye Alemu Zenebe, Dilla University, Ethiopia.

(2) Lucia Stančiaková, Univerzita Komenského V Bratislave,  Slovak Republic.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhushan Raghuwanshi, MUHS, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Wagaye Alemu Zenebe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Lucia Stančiaková, Slovak Republic) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Perception and Determinants of Gender Preference among Men in Isoko South Local Government Council, Oleh, Delta State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashish Anand, GV Montgomery Veteran Affairs Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Omolara Elsie Babajide, Osun State University Nigeria, Nigeria And Queens University Canada, Canada.

(2) Dayang Haszelinna Binti Abang Ali, Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Omolara Elsie Babajide, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dayang Haszelinna Binti Abang Ali, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Toxicological Activity of the Methanolic Leaf Extract of Some Medicinal Plants Used in Sokoto Township and Environs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed AliAbdel-Rahman, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Amarendra Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Madieha Ambreen, Minhaj University Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Amarendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Madieha Ambreen, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Optimization of Boron and Zinc on the Growth and Yield Parameters of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in Nalanda District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hakan Sevik, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Tolera Abera Goshu, Ethiopian Institute Of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

(2) Ibrahim Kaleel, G D Goenka University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Basuchaudhuri, India.

(2) Abd El- Rhman Ibrahim El –Sayed Ramdan, Desert Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Jose Alfredo Padilla Medina, National Technology of Mexico in Celaya, México.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tolera Abera Goshu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ibrahim Kaleel, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Diet and Coronary Artery Disease: Part I: Healthy Macronutrients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, The Netherlands.

(2) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, Medical Doctor in Cardiology, “F. Perinei” Hospital, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Damayanti Agrawal, Apex Hospital Varanasi, India.

(2) Prasan Kumar Hota, Kaloji Narayana Rao University Of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Aryan Naghedi, Shahid Sadoughi University Of Medical Sciences,  Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jurandyr Santos Nogueira, Polytechnic School – Federal University of Bahia, Brazil.

(2) Fulden Sarac, Ege University,Turkey.

(3) Georgios Sfikas, 424 General Military Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Damayanti Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Prasan Kumar Hota, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Aryan Naghedi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: GEMS, GMOS and Third Generation Transgenic Plants: Biofactories

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shailasree Sekhar, University Of  Mysor, India.

(2) Rajendra Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shailasree Sekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Rajendra Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Using Instructional Screencast to Teach Digital Immigrants: A Paradigm Shift in the 21st Century Learning Process

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. FAGBADEBO Omololu Michael, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Antonio Luque De La Rosa, Universidad De Almería, Spain.

(2) Müfit Şenel, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.

(3) Eduardo Mario Lacues Apud, Catholic University of Uruguay, Uruguay.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ching Yee Yong, University of Technology Sarawak, Malaysia.

(2) Gulzhaina K. Kassymova, Satbayev University, Kazakhstan.

(3) Meriem Boumehed, Higher School of Electrical and Energetic Engineering of Oran (ESGEE), Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Antonio Luque De La Rosa, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Müfit Şenel, Turkey) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Eduardo Mario Lacues Apud, Uruguay) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Self Rating of Satisfaction with Dental Appearance of a Group of Nigerian Doctors and Nurses

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armando Montesinos Flores, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Ranganadha Reddy, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology & Research, India.

(2) Cristine Miron Stefani, University of Brasilia, Bazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R. Pradeep Kumar, Saveetha Institute of Medicial And Technical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (A. Ranganadha Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Cristine Miron Stefani, Bazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA