Peer Review History: Outcome of Tuberculosis Case Surveillance at Kano Central Correctional Center, North-west Nigeria: A Need for Routine Active Case Findings for TB in Nigerian Correctional Centers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Antonio Sánchez Portela, University of Medical Sciences of Pinar of Río, Cuba.

(2) Farman Ullah Khan, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vaibhav Saria, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Carlos Antonio Sánchez Portela, Cuba) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Farman Ullah Khan, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Exploring the Genetic Variability for Yield Attributing Traits among the Indigenous and Exotic Collection of Wheat in Cis-Himalayan Region of West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkata Sanyasi Seshendra Kumar Karri, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management University, India.

(2) Hari Prakash Meena, ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nisha Rana, Swami Vivekand Subharti University, India.

(2) Ganapati Mukri, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Venkata Sanyasi Seshendra Kumar Karri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hari Prakash Meena, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effect on Integrated Nutrient Management on Productivity, Quality and Nutrient Uptake on Summer Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar,Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexandre Ricardo Pereira Schuler, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

(2) B.G. Shivakumar, ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krishna Dhakal, Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Nepal.

(2) Meksy Dianawati, Indonesia Agency for Agriculture Research and Development, Indonesia.

(3) Nilim Kalita, Citrus Research Station, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(4) Yousif H. Alnaser, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Alexandre Ricardo Pereira Schuler, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (B.G. Shivakumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Review of Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Resistance of Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturer (CAD‐CAM) Fabricated Endo-crowns

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. SAWADOGO Wamtinga Richard, Ministry of higher education, scientific research and innovation, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Tamanpreet Kaur, Swami devi dyal hospital and dental college, India.

(2) Gaurav patri, Kalinga institute of dental sciences, KIIT deemed to be university, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gaurav Gupta, Jaipur Dental College, India.

(2) Nishtha Kathiria, College of dental science and research centre, India.

(3) Praveen k Bankur, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(4) Prerak Doshi, Gujarat University, India.

(5) Shwetha Poovani, Rajarajeswari Dental College and Hospital, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tamanpreet Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Gaurav patri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Knowledge and Attitude towards Vitamin D among Saudi Female university students at Princess Nourah University

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajiv Nehra, Government Medical College, India.

(2) Kennedy Ajiroghene Osakwe Adakporia, Rmit University, Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Teresa Maria Tomasa-Irriguible, Germans Trias I Pujol Hospital, Spain.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rajiv Nehra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kennedy Ajiroghene Osakwe Adakporia, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 |  Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Effect of Vata Dosha on Intelligence Quotient and Emotional Quotient

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Japan.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Asha S. A., Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Sathish Hs, Rajiv gandhi university of health sciences, India.

(3) Kiran Tawalare, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

(4) Manoj M Jagtap, Maharashtra University Of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Asha S. A., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Sathish Hs, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Kiran Tawalare, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Manoj M Jagtap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Comparison of the Hypotension in Lateral Verses Sitting Positions during Induction of Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Shaymaa  Abdul  Hadi  Kadhim  Almansoori, Babylon university , Iraq.

(2) Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu, Imo State University, Nigeria.

(3) Juan Miguel Alemán-Iñiguez, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shaymaa  Abdul  Hadi  Kadhim  AlmansooriIraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Emmanuel Ifeanyi Obeagu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Juan Miguel Alemán-Iñiguez, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: A Short Communication on Wastewater Treatment Techniques Used in Pharmaceutical Plant

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, Professor, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Noureddine Ouerfelli, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia.

(2) Pradeep Kumar Das, N. C Autonomous College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Noureddine Ouerfelli, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Pradeep Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Level of Knowledge in Physical Therapy of Tunisian Physical Education Teachers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Professor, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ercan TURAL, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.

(2) Phyu Hnin Hlaing, Alumni- Mahidol University, Myanmar.

(3)

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ercan Tural, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Phyu Hnin Hlaing, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


 

Peer Review History: Recent Modalities in the Diagnosis of Obesity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Reviewers:

(1) Shweta, Sarvodaya Multispeciality and Cancer Hospital, India.

(2) Harish S., R.L. Jalappa Institute of Technology, Visveswaraya Technological University, India.

 

Additional Reviewers:

 

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shweta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Harish S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA