Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Fátima de cássia oliveira gomes, Centro Federal De Educação Tecnológica De Minas Gerais, Brazil.

(2) Alireza Ala, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(3) Srikanth Reddy, Mamata Dental College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Erick Platini Ferreira de Souto, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Brazil.

(2) Marina Vaidya Shrestha, Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu University, Nepal.

(3) Shanthi Ramesh, Sree Balaji Medical College & Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fátima de cássia oliveira gomes, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Alireza Ala, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Srikanth Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Halit Demir, Yil University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shruti Chandra, MGM Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Uma Narayanamurthy, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shruti Chandra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Uma Narayanamurthy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmood Reza Sadikhani, Lorestan University, Iran.

(2) Belkhodja Hamza, University of Mustapha Stambouli, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mahmood Reza Sadikhani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Belkhodja Hamza, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sahdeo Prasad, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulkadir Abubakar, Federal University Of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Akharaiyi Fred Coolborn, Edo State University Uzairue, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Abdulkadir Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Akharaiyi Fred Coolborn, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, USA

Reviewers:

(1) Rana Binyamin, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) F. M. Aminuzzaman, Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(3) Malik Ahsaf Aziz, Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences And Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hussein Ali Salim, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Rana Binyamin, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (F. M. Aminuzzaman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Malik Ahsaf Aziz, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Centre for Integrative Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) João Luiz de Moraes Hoefel, Centro Universitário Unifaat, Brazil.

(2) Retno Hartati, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oyedeji Oluseye, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Fingesi U.I, Forestry Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (João Luiz de Moraes Hoefel, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Retno Hartati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Oyediran W. O, Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, Nigeria.

(2) Ernesto A. Chávezy Ortiz, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, México.

(3) Mustafa S. F. Ziyadi, The Presidency of the University of Basra, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yousif M. S. Al-Barzinji, Salahaddin University-Erbil, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Oyediran W. O, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ernesto A. Chávez y Ortiz, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Mustafa S. F. Ziyadi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Vijayaram, Jimei University, China.

(2) Usha Vyas, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (S.Vijayaram, China) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Usha Vyas, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Shyamrao Kulkarni, Universisty Of Agricultural Sciences Raichur, India.

(2) Barbara Wieliczko, Poland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Ramzi Mohd Hussain, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shyamrao Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Barbara Wieliczko, Poland) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Vitória Segabinazzi Foletto, Federal University Of Santa Maria, Brazil.

(2) Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, “Ovidius” University, Constanța, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M V S Krishna Karthik, JSS Medical College, India.

(2) J. Nithyalakshmi, SRI Muthukumaran Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, India.

(3) Maria Taciana Cavalcanti Vieira Soares, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Brasil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vitória Segabinazzi Foletto, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dan Răzvan Popoviciu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA