Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil (Manolis) Magiorkinis, General Hospital for Chest Diseases “Sotiria”, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Raushan Kumar, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Nikolaos  Laliotis, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Raushan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Nikolaos  Laliotis, Greece) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Latha K, Anna University, India.

(2) Dileep Singh Baghel, Lovely Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Juan José Acevedo Fernández, Autonomous University of Mexico State, Mexico.

(2) Pipat Chooto, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Latha K, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Dileep Singh Baghel, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Francesco Pelliccia, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

(2) Dr. Jagadeesh Kalavakunta, Michigan State University And Western Michigan University,  Michigan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mitu ovidiu, Universitatea de medicină şi farmacie “grigore t. Popa”, romania.

(2) Bistra Galunska, Medical University Of Varna, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mitu ovidiu, romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Bistra Galunska, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sule Isin, Ege University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Anthony N. Rezitis, University of Helsinki, Finland And Universiy of Patras, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Son Duong Van, Thai Nguyen University of Agriculture and Forestry, Vietnam.

(2) Ahmed-Gamgum Williams A, Taraba State Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(3) Chukwuyem Iharagbon, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(4) Mohammed Viquaruddin, India.

(5) Jesser Paladines, Universidad Técnica de Machala, Ecuador.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Son Duong Van, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Ahmed-Gamgum Williams A,  Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Chukwuyem Iharagbon, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Mohammed Viquaruddin, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_5 (Jesser Paladines, Ecuador) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shi-Hai Dong, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Thomas F. George, University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Vikrant P. Katekar, S.B. Jain Institute Of Technology, India.

(2) Marian Costea, Politehnica University Of Bucharest, Romania.

(3) Malik El’houyoun Ahamadi, University of the Comoros, Comoros.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Vikrant P. Katekar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Malik El’houyoun Ahamadi, Comoros) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Marian Costea, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mona Ahmed Awad Soliman, Egypt.

(2) Elmnifi Monaem, Bright Star University, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Mona Ahmed Awad Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Elmnifi Monaem, Libya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giulio Tarro, Foundation T. & L. de Beaumont Bonelli for cancer Research, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Tianwen Wang, Xinyang Normal University, China.

(2) Zeinab Abd Elkhalek Ali El-Shahed, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Tianwen Wang, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Zeinab Abd Elkhalek Ali El-Shahed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Piotr Dudek, Medical Centre of Postgraduate Education, Poland.

(2) Hossein Aslani, Tabriz university of Medical sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.25/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Piotr Dudek, Poland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Hossein Aslani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Kowichi Jimbow, Japan.

(2) Virgínia Oliveira Crema, Federal University Of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil.

(3) Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, North Manchester General Hospital, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 8.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Kowichi Jimbow, Japan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Virgínia Oliveira Crema, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Anthony Kodzo-Grey Venyo, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Fernando Jaén Águila, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Spain.

(2) Larisa Anghel, Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie “Grigore T. Popa”, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Fernando Jaén Águila, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Larisa Anghel, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA