Peer Review History: The Role of Machine Learning in Enhancing Corporate Financial Planning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, School of Economics and Management, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanna Alieksieieva, Berdyansk State Pedagogical University, Ukraine.

(2) Chetan Bulla, VTU, India.

(3) Cansu Ergenç, Anakara Yildirim Beyazit University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Harshal Shah, Parul University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanna Alieksieieva, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chetan Bulla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Cansu Ergenç, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Corporate Boards and Firm Value: Evidence from Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Adina Dornean, Associate Professor, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania.

(2) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ezeala George, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Abhisheck Kumar Singhania, Dhemaji Commerce College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pravesh Soti, School of Management, Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ezeala George, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhisheck Kumar Singhania, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Rural Finance Institution Building Programme on Socioeconomic Condition of Beneficiaries in Anambra State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandan Kumar Panda, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Adamu Idi, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(3) Praveen Paul J, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandan Kumar Panda, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adamu Idi, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Praveen Paul J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hepatoprotective Properties of Citrus aurantifolia Juice and Carica papaya Seed Extract Mixture against Carbon Tetrachloride Induced Liver Injury in Albino Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Niranjan D, AHP College, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, India.

(2) Maryyum Khalil, University of the Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niranjan D, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maryyum Khalil, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Selected Actinomycetes as Potential Biostimulant of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L) in Mali

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Tehran, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Mary Jhane G. Valentino, Central Luzon State University, Philippines.

(2) Ullas Prasanna S., Kuvempu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aaqib Ayub, SKUAST-Jammu, India.

(2) K. Vignesh, Palar Agricultural College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mary Jhane G. Valentino, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ullas Prasanna S., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Irrigation Scheduling to Enhance Nutrient Uptake and Soil Microbial Activity in Linseed Cultivation (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Kumar, Eternal University, India.

(2) Saransh Kumar Gautam, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.Bhavana, School of Agricultural Sciences (SOAS), Mallareddy University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saransh Kumar Gautam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Value Chain Analysis of Apple in Shimla District of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluwafemi Royal Aliu, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, United Kingdom.

(2) R. Suriya, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluwafemi Royal Aliu, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Suriya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rainfall Patterns and Groundwater Dynamics: Implications for Soil and Water Conservation in Kodihalli Sub-Watershed, Haveri District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, WALMI Campus, Bhopal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mekonen Gedewon Aynalem, Mekdela Amba University, Ethiopia.

(2) Anteneh Asfaw Ayalew, Woldia University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mekonen Gedewon Aynalem, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anteneh Asfaw Ayalew, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Geo Spatial Assessment and Micronutrient Mapping of Calcareous Soils in Muzaffarpur District, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) G Kiran Reddy, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Odum Princewill, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eltaher Mohamed Shams, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) P A Azeez, Bharathidasan University, India.

(3) Shiva Kumar. D, University of Mysore, India.

(4) Keerti Kulkarni, BNM Institute of Technology, India.

(5) Zehraa Najim, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G Kiran Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Odum Princewill, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Future of Work: A Human-centric Approach to AI, Robotics, and Cloud Computing

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, Assistant Professor, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Reepu, Chandigarh University, India.

(2) Smrita Jain, Moradabad Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Imran Hussain, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reepu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Smrita Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Imran Hussain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA