Peer Review History: Climate Risk Management among Smallholder Farmers: A Comparative Analysis of Flood-prone Alappuzha and Drought-affected Gondia in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Universitaria Agustiniana, Colombia.

(2) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nguyen Thi Dung, Bac Giang Agriculture and Forestry University, Viet Nam.

(2) J.Vasanthakumar, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dustin Tahisin Gómez Rodríguez, Colombia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jacob Pitti, Panama) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Some Leading Mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars in Bihar Condition Based on Yield and Chemical Quality Parameters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Chumki Dutta, Assam Down Town University, India.

(2) M. Kumaresan, Vels Institutes of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chumki Dutta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Kumaresan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: High Pressure Processing: Pros and Cons

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Raffaella Preti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

(2) Dr. Ghulam Khaliq, Associate Professor, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water & Marine Sciences, Uthal, Pakistan.

(3) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Head of the Pediatric Surgery Service, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Moriken Sangare, Higher Institute of Veterinary Sciences and Medicine, ISSMV, Guinea.

(2) Banafsheh Bagheri, Tehran University of Medical Science, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moriken Sangare, Guinea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Banafsheh Bagheri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Positive Effects of Growth Retardants on Castor (Ricinus communis L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratnum Kaul Wattal, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratnum Kaul Wattal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanan Salah Eldin Taha, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: First Global Host Report and New Distribution Record of Bactrocera penecorrecta Drew (Diptera: Tephritidae) from Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Muthu Lakshmi Bavithra C, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Manoj Kumar Jena, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bengouga Khalila, Algeria.

(2) Giddi Thirumala Devi, Sun Institute of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(3) Joenil G. Frayco, North Eastern Mindanao State University, Philippines.

(4) Kashinath Chiluwal, Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Nepal.

(5) N. Irabanta Singh, Manipur Central University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muthu Lakshmi Bavithra C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Jena, Poland) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Iron and Zinc Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in Loamy Sand

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali, DSB Campus, Kumaun University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rajesh Chintey, Birangana Sati Sadhani Rajyik Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Kapil Prasad Marasini, HICAST, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Robin Kumar, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rajesh Chintey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kapil Prasad Marasini, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effect of Tube Voltage Variations on CT Scan Image Quality at Prof. I G. N. G. Ngoerah General Hospital, Denpasar, Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Khalil Kassmi, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Pinsara De Silva, National Hospital Galle, Sri Lanka.

(2) Belay Sitotaw Goshu, Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pinsara De Silva, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Belay Sitotaw Goshu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of Functional Matrix systems for core drug delivery in Multiple Unit Pellet System (MUPS)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hassanien, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Arvind Raghav, Teerthanker Mahaveer College of Pharmacy, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Ashish Shivram Ramteke, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Shivram Ramteke, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arvind Raghav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Shivram Ramteke, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA