Peer Review History: Exploring the Socio-economic Factors and Challenges Affecting Rural Neem Seed Collectors

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) M. Rajashekhar, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anand Kumar, GLA University, India.

(3) Vandana Sheoran, C.R. Law College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. Rajashekhar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anand Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vandana Sheoran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cytotoxic and Anti-inflammatory Properties of Two Medicinal Plant Recipes Decoctions, acphyx and chryfa, Used in Traditional Medicine of Burkina Faso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhananjay Sharma, Amity Medical School, Amity University, India.

(2) Sandip Chatterjee, Narayan institute of Pharmacy, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

(3) Kokila Thiagarajah, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhananjay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandip Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kokila Thiagarajah, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenging Material Progress: Postcolonial and Eco-critical Perspectives on Indigenous Identity in Orijit Sen’s the River of Stories

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jashanpreet Kaur, Panjab University, India.

(2) Mohammad Rahmatullah, Northern University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

(3) Ritu Sharma, MMDU, India.

(4) Romero Santos, Ruben, Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jashanpreet Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Rahmatullah, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ritu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Romero Santos, Ruben, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Social Media Preferences and Usage Behaviour among Indonesians Insights and Implications for Business Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

(2) Pappu Rajan A, St. Joseph’s College, Bharathidasan University, India.

(3) Veena Prasad Vemuri, NKES College of Arts Commerce and Science, India.

(4) Sheetal Bura, School of Commerce and Management, DYP International University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Sindhura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pappu Rajan A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Veena Prasad Vemuri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sheetal Bura, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Modified Atmospheric Storage on Seed Longevity of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Raksha Goswami, Lakhsmi Narain College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Pratibha D. Sharma, DRPCAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raksha Goswami, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratibha D. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Management of Postpartum Cervico-Vaginal Prolapse in Graded Murrah Buffalo: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Durjoy Majumder, West Bengal State University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Malasri G, KVAFSU, India.

(2) Pushkar Sharma, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malasri G, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pushkar Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Field to Market: The Challenges Faced by Onion Growers in Chitradurga, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sterie Maria Cristina, Academy of Economic Sciences from Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Ansuman Satapathy, Siksha “O” Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sterie Maria Cristina, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ansuman Satapathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Instability Analysis and Decomposition of Output of Oilseeds Crops in Rajasthan and India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Khadiga Ahmed Ismail, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Brota Sing Bey, College of Post Graduate Studies in Agricultural Sciences, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anjali Tiwari, National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Brota Sing Bey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anjali Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integration of Renewable Energy Solutions in Agricultural Operations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Associate Professor, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

(2) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor, Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Hasddin, Lakidende University, Indonesia.

(2) G Kiran Reddy, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hasddin, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G Kiran Reddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on the Characteristics of Steel Slag and its Road Performance in Asphalt Mixture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kamalesh Kumar, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, India.

(2) T. Phani Madhavi, MIT College of Management, MIT Art, Design and Technology University, India.

(3) Amarsinh B. Landage, Government College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kamalesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Phani Madhavi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amarsinh B. Landage, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA