Peer Review History: Antidiabetic and Protective Effects of Aqueous Seed Extract of Persea americana in the Pancreas of Alloxan-Induced Diabetic Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Arun Kumar Kapoor, Rohilkhand Medical College & Hospital, Bareilly M.L.N. Medical College, Allahabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anita Restu Puji Raharjeng, Universitas Islam Negeri, Indonesia.

(2) Peter Ozomata Balogun, Yaba College of Technology, University Lyon 1, France.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anita Restu Puji Raharjeng, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Peter Ozomata Balogun, France) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Analysis of the Contribution of Minimally Invasive Surgery Toto Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Robert Meves, Santa Casa School of Medicine, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Suyash Singh, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Bhawna Thakur, Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suyash Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhawna Thakur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Eco Friendly Management of Alternaria Blight Disease: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Supriya Pratap Babar, The Institute of Science, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) S. Sibmah Stalin, Nesamony Memorial Christian College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Supriya Pratap Babar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sibmah Stalin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Ethylene Glycol and Diethanolamine Modified African Pear Seed Oil as Pour Point Depressants for Waxy Crude Oil

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cheikh Sall, Hod, Université Iba Der THIAM, Senegal.

Reviewers:

(1) Pawan Nandkishor Karwa, Dr D Y Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, India.

(2) Ranjan Kumar Singh, Raffles University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pawan Nandkishor Karwa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ranjan Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Seed Priming on Adaptive Morphological Traits of Anaerobic Germination Tolerant Upland Rice Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ashutosh Kumar, Assistant Professor, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anirban Bhowmik, Midnapore City College, India.

(2) Bipin Deochand Lade, Virginia Tech University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anirban Bhowmik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bipin Deochand Lade, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Student Perceptions and Expectations of Peer Mentoring: A Study of the Lobomentoría Program at Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Rosemary Madzore, University of South Africa, Zimbabwe.

(2) Debo Sulaimon Arikewuyo, Nigeria.

(3) Nasrudeen Ayinde Malik, Osun State University, Nigeria.

(4) Sharadha S, Surana College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rosemary Madzore, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debo Sulaimon Arikewuyo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nasrudeen Ayinde Malik, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sharadha S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Rosemary Madzore, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Debo Sulaimon Arikewuyo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Nasrudeen Ayinde Malik, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Objective Visual Acuity Estimation via the Optokinetic Response to High-pass Filtered Stimuli: An Exploratory Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmad M Mansour, Professor, American University of Beirut, Lebanon.

Reviewers:

(1) Mona Abdelkader, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(2) Prakhar Chaudhary, Vinayak Siddi Hospital Eye and Child Care Centre, India.

(3) Italo Giuffre, Catholic University of Rome, Italy.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mona Abdelkader, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prakhar Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Italo Giuffre, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Scale to Measure the Level of Management Orientation of the Members of Farmer Producer Company with Reference to Potato Production in Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Zeru Yimer Kebede, Pawe Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

(2) Bannoth Jaswanth Naik, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zeru Yimer Kebede, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bannoth Jaswanth Naik, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Plant Growth Regulators on Growth, Seed Yield and Economics of Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) cv. Jawahar Dhaniya-10

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rohitashv Nagar, Career Point University, India.

(2) Raghuveer Choudhary, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(3) Abdul Basit, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rohitashv Nagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghuveer Choudhary, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdul Basit, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Geo-Hydrobiology and Geoinformatics Mapping of Ethnobotany in the Gandhamardan Hills, Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Rama Rao, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(2) Bikram Pradhan, Bharat Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Sumera Nazneen, Anwarul Uloom College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Rama Rao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bikram Pradhan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sumera Nazneen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA