Peer Review History: Efficacy of Bio-Pesticides against Leaf Miner, Liriomyza sp. of Field Pea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Kushal Naharki, School of Agriculture and Food System, West Virginia University, USA.

(2) Dzokou Victor Joly, University of Yaounde, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kushal Naharki, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dzokou Victor Joly, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Dates and Varieties on Growth and Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Central Plain Zone of U.P, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Manimala Mahato, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) S. K. Verma, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manimala Mahato, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. K. Verma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Irrigation and Nitrogen Management on Summer Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Rakesh Kumar, SKUAST, India.

(2) Leishangthem Momo Singh, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rakesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Leishangthem Momo Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmacist’s Knowledge and Attitudes toward Digital Health Tools

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hesty Utami Ramadaniati, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(2) Cranjib Dutta, Guru Nanak Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hesty Utami Ramadaniati, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cranjib Dutta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emerging Protein and Peptide Therapeutics for Osteoporosis: Advances in Anabolic and Catabolic Treatments

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wenbin Zeng, Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Simranjeet Kaur, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy & Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Murooj G. Jameel, Al- Yarmouk University College, Iraq.

(3) Slavica Jankovic, University Lavoslav Ružička, Croatia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simranjeet Kaur, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Murooj G. Jameel, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Slavica Jankovic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pharmacists Attitude and Perceived Barriers toward Providing Vaccination Services

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Nazer Ali, Geethanjali College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Theophilus Pius, Kampala International University Western Campus, Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Nazer Ali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theophilus Pius, Uganda) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Community Pharmacists in Lahore Regarding Prescription Patterns in Children: A Cross Sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Begum Rokeya, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharoon Mirza, Abasyn University, Pakistan.

(2) Wong Pei Nee, Institute of Applied Technology, United Arab Emirates.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharoon Mirza, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wong Pei Nee, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating Seasonal Dynamics of Water Quality and Embankment Soil along the Gorai River in Kushtia, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Menuka Maharjan, Institute of Forestry, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Nitu Kumari, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Menuka Maharjan, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nitu Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Management of Root Rot (Rhizoctonia solani) of Okra Through Novel Combined Formulations of Fungicides

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Zaheen Hasan, M.L.K.(P.G.) College, India.

(2) Krishna Kumar, School of Agriculture, Galgotias University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zaheen Hasan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farmers Awareness and Perception of Drone Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpi R. Sindhu, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) David Msokwe, Tanzania Institute of Accountancy, Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpi R. Sindhu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (David Msokwe, Tanzania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA