Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Advancements in the Use of Bayer Red Mud as a Sustainable Cementitious Material in Concrete: Challenges and Opportunities

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Kondapalli Siva Prasad, Anil Neerukonda Institute Of Technology And Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhamad Soffi Manda, Polytechnic Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Sajan Sharma, Dr B R Ambedkar National Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhamad Soffi Manda, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sajan Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Occurrence and Characterization of Residues and Contaminants in Shrimp and Fish Samples from Aquaculture and Wild Capture in Brazil

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Carmen Lizette del Toro Sanchez, University of Sonora, Mexico.

(2) Dr. Demetris Kafouris, Laboratory of Environmental and other Food Contaminants and Physical Toxins, Nicosia, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Haidar Ali, Govt. Degree College, Shravasti, India.

(2) Israel Joshua Barde, National Veterinary Research Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Haidar Ali, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israel Joshua Barde, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluating the Clinical and Procedural Outcomes of Coronary Angioplasty: Experience of the Avicenne Military Hospital in Marrakech, Morocco

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India

Reviewers:

(1) Azzam Jamil Falah Al-Rifaee, The University of Jordan, Jordan, Jordan.

(2) Mohamad Ail Yadegari, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Azzam Jamil Falah Al-Rifaee, Jordan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohamad Ail Yadegari, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Limonene and Fatty Acid Content of the Volatile Oil of Raphia australis Fruit Pulp and Their Synergistic In vivo Anti-inflammatory Activity

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR.

Reviewers:

(1) C. Janani, Srimad Andavan Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Sonam Bhutia, Government Pharmacy College, Sikkim University, India.

(3) Praveen Kumar Dasari, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C. Janani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sonam Bhutia, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveen Kumar Dasari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Social Interaction Pattern Within the Self Help Groups (SHGs) in Rayagada District of Odisha, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, School of Education, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandra Shekhar, IGNOU, India.

(2) Bharath Samishetti, Balaji Institute of Management Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandra Shekhar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bharath Samishetti, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Integrated Crop Management for Enhancing Mango Yield through Front Line Demonstrations in Sangareddy District, Telangana, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Osunleti Samuel Oluwaseun, Edo State College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nigeria.

(2) Deepak Rai, ICAR-National Institute of Secondary Agriculture, India.

(3) Ahasan Ullah Khan, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Osunleti Samuel Oluwaseun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Rai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ahasan Ullah Khan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Challenges and Future Scope in Onion and Other Root Crop De-Topping Machines and Its Performance: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Abubakar, Waziri Umaru Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Anayatullah Niyazi, Ch. B. P. Govt Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anayatullah Niyazi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Data Governance for Emerging Technologies: A Conceptual Framework for Managing Blockchain, IoT, and AI

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muyiwa Emmanual DAGUNDURO, Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Chirag Mavani, USA.

(3) Hirenkumar Mistry, Grand Canyon University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muyiwa Emmanual DAGUNDURO, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chirag Mavani, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hirenkumar Mistry, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Evaluation of Protein Content of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) on Maize and Cotton Crops in Telangana, India

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Surendra Singh Shekhawat, SGT University, India.

(2) Swastik Bhattacharjya, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

(3) Anu C N, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Surendra Singh Shekhawat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swastik Bhattacharjya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anu C N, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA