Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) VYT Dany, University of Rennes, France.

(2) Athul Jayaram, Amity Business School, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (VYT Dany, France) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Athul Jayaram, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Swarnapriya, Hortl. College & Research Institute, India.

(2) Ananya Khatun, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Swarnapriya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ananya Khatun, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Shamim Akhtar, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

(2) Hussein Farid Mohamed, Nuclear Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shamim Akhtar, Pakistan ) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hussein Farid Mohamed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cengiz Yucedag, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Shubham Chauhan, Hemvati Nandan Bahuguna Garhwal University, India.

(2) Bonsa Fentale Jilo, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shubham Chauhan, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bonsa Fentale Jilo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Konne, Felix Eedee, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Shilpa Mahapatra, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Utkal University, India.

(3) Devangee P Shukla, Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Konne, Felix Eedee, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shilpa Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Devangee P Shukla, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. John Yahya I. Elshimali, Adjunct Professor, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Cirnatu Daniela, Western University “Vasile Goldiş” from Arad, Romania.

(2) María de los Ángeles Velasco Hernández, Instituto de Ciencias-BUAP, México.

(3) Monier Morad Wahba, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.27/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cirnatu Daniela, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (María de los Ángeles Velasco Hernández, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Monier Morad Wahba, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shivangi H Zaveri, Bhagwan Mahavir University, India.

(2) Anita Pande, College of Biotechnology, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shivangi H Zaveri, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anita Pande, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moaed Al Meselmani, The University of Sheffield, UK.

Reviewers:

(1) Zarish Maqsood, Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad, Pakistan.

(2) Shivam Chaubey, India.

(3) Kamal Kumar Pande, Agriculture Science Centre, India.

(4) Malini A. Shett, Bangalore University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zarish Maqsood, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivam Chaubey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamal Kumar Pande, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Malini A. Shett, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, Assistant Professor, Dean, School of Science and Technology, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Nuning Rahmawati, Indonesia.

(2) Mansi Dwivedi, DDU Gorakhpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mriganka Mandal, Dr. Kanailal Bhattacharyya College, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nuning Rahmawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mansi Dwivedi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Uttara Singh, Assistant Professor, Panjab University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gana Manjusha Kondepudi, Vignan Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, India.

(2) P.Udaya Chandrika, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gana Manjusha Kondepudi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P.Udaya Chandrika, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA