Peer Review History: Hygienic Floor Management Using Hot Water: A Strategy to Reduce Piglet Mortality in Northeastern India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Shekhmous H. Hussen, University of Duhok, Iraq.

(2) Poonam Shakya, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, India.

(3) Van Lalhmangaihsanga, Siksha ‘O’ Anushandhan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jitender Kumar Jakhar, Dau Shri Vasudev Chandrakar Kamdhenu Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Manaswini Dehuri, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shekhmous H. Hussen, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Poonam Shakya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Van Lalhmangaihsanga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Shekhmous H. Hussen, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Poonam Shakya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Van Lalhmangaihsanga, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v2 (Shekhmous H. Hussen, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Early Blight Disease Resistant Tomato F1 Hybrid Arka Abhed in Karimnagar District of Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Md. Harun-Ur-Rashid, Associate Professor, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Ragiman Sreenath Reddy, IARI, India.

(2) Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ragiman Sreenath Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating Patient Perceptions of Pharmacist-Led Medication Therapy Management in Hypertension Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Randa Salah Juma Mahmoud, University of Zagazig, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Oluwafemi Ajoyemi Ala, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Ugboma Evaristus Jideofor, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluwafemi Ajoyemi Ala, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ugboma Evaristus Jideofor, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: FDA Warning Letter Trends: A 15-Year Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R. Deveswaran, Associate Professor & Head, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

(2) Prof. Rafik Karaman, Distinguished Professor, College of Pharmacy, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Abm Mahfuz Ul Alam, Bangladesh.

(2) Bashyal Saroj, Keimyung University, Nepal.

(3) Sayonara Ay More, Brazil.

(4) Mohammad Mahdi Abolhasani, Tehran University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Valentina Divocha, Ukrainian Research Institute for medicine of Transport, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.07/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abm Mahfuz Ul Alam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bashyal Saroj, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sayonara Ay More, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mohammad Mahdi Abolhasani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Hepatoprotective Activity of Ethanolic Extract of the Seed of Flacourtia jangomas against ccl4 -Induced Liver Damage in Rat Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, Associate Professor, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) V Ravi Kumar, Guru Nanak Institutions Technical Campus, India.

(2) Devid Chutia, Himalayan Pharmacy Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rama University Kanpur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V Ravi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Devid Chutia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Application of Digital Technology in Improving the Progress Management of Assembly Buildings

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Omer Saad Ali Hameed, University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

(2) Sebastian Carcamo, Pothifical Catholic University of Chile, Chile.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omer Saad Ali Hameed, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sebastian Carcamo, Chile) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Genetics of Heat Tolerance through Yield Performance Evaluation in Tropical Maize (Zea mays L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreejana K C, University of Delaware, USA.

(2) Anu George, G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shreejana K C, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anu George, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Actuation Drones in Agriculture: Advancing Precision Pest Management through Biocontrol and Modern Techniques

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Serhii Kyryliuk, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Ukraine.

(2) Yusuf Hajara Oyiza, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Serhii Kyryliuk, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yusuf Hajara Oyiza, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Associated with the Uptake of Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine among Girls Aged 9-14 Years in Buikwe District, Central Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sneha Mihir Dokhale, B.K. Birla College, India.

(2) Mamta Sharma, Dr. Giri Cancer Research Institute, India.

(3) Abdul Nazer Ali, Geethanjali College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sneha Mihir Dokhale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mamta Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abdul Nazer Ali, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Exponential Attractor for a Two-Temperature Phase Transition Model

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Assistant Professor, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Francis Odhiambo Akwenda, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(2) Fatemeh Soleyman, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Francis Odhiambo Akwenda, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatemeh Soleyman, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA