Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Pylon of an Irregular Low Pylon Cable-Stayed Bridge: A Review

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

(2) Dr. M. Sumesh, Associate Professor, M.I.E.T. Engineering College (Autonomous), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Debiao Meng, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, China.

(2) Rehan Ahmad Khan, Aligarh Muslim University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debiao Meng, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rehan Ahmad Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Data Augmentation Techniques Using Generative Adversarial Networks: Employing GANs to Create Synthetic Data for Enhancing Machine Learning Model Training

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Nishiya Vijayan, Mar Athanasius College of Engineering, India.

(2) Archana Balkrishna Yadav, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(3) Alireza Safariyan, Jahrom University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nishiya Vijayan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana Balkrishna Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alireza Safariyan, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Analyzing the Impact of Environmental and Behavioral Factors on Flood Risk

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. G. Anusha, Head, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Simon Stephen Mshelia, Federal University Gashua, Nigeria.

(2) Boyeth C. Pelone, Davao del Norte State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simon Stephen Mshelia, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Boyeth C. Pelone, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Practices in Bekwarra Local Government Area: Environmental Impacts and Community Awareness

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Abir Ornob, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Agya Ahunoabobirim Bosompem, Nordhausen University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abir Ornob, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agya Ahunoabobirim Bosompem, Germany) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Surveillance of Bovine Trypanosomiasis in the Peri-urban Zone of Bamako as a Prelude to Eradicate the Disease in the Basin of River Niger Mali

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Neena Singla, Principal Zoologist, College of Basic Sciences & Humanities, Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhisek Mishra, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

(2) Shadrach Atnaga Mamman, Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhisek Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shadrach Atnaga Mamman, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Optimizing Operational Efficiency: A Case Study of Attitudinal, Stress, and Performance Factors in Security Personnel

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Rindu, Universitas Indonesia Maju, Indonesia.

(2) Sawmya S, VIT University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rindu, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sawmya S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessment of Selected Heavy Metals in Sediments from Ndambuk River, Busia County, Kenya

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Akmal S. Gaballa, Vice Dean, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Aqib Zahoor, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hainan University, P. R. China.

(2) Oiseoje Michael Wangboje, University of Benin, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aqib Zahoor, P. R. China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oiseoje Michael Wangboje, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Role of Upper and Lower GIT Endoscopy in Patients with Suspected Bilateral Adnexal Masses

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Erich Cosmi, Chair Director,
University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jita Parija, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre, India.

(2) Shashi Prakash, S. N. Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jita Parija, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashi Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: THE RETENTION IN ANTIRETROVIRAL THEARPY AND ITS ASSOCIATED FACTORS AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN IN GAMBORU MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH CLINIC (MCH), MAIDUGURI, NIGERIA.

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Faisal, Assistant Professor,
Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Trusty Lomcebo Mbatha, Southern Africa Nazarene University (SANU), Swaziland.

(2) Elton Chavura, Mzuzu University, Malawi.

(3) Massreshaw Assnakew Abebe, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Trusty Lomcebo Mbatha, Swaziland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Elton Chavura, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Massreshaw Assnakew Abebe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA