Peer Review History: Exploring Guava and Neem Extracts as Therapeutic Options for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Africa

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mazen Saleh, Associate Professor, Laurentian University, Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University, Canada.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramesh S. Yamgar, Chikitsak Samuha’s Patkar Varde College, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Hemant Sarin, USA.

(3) Jhinuk Basu Mullick, University of Florida, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S Nivetha , Arignar Anna College, M.S. University, India.

(2) Asma Fayaz, Chandigarh University, India.

(3) B Lakshminarayanan, Sanjo College of Pharmaceutical Studies, India.

(4) Madhu toshniwal, Govt. Women engineering college, India.

(5) Safaa Fathy Saleh Ali, Jazan University & Fayoum University, Egypt.

(6) Shailju Gulshan Gurunani, Priyadarshini J. L. College of Pharmacy, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur, India.

(7) Uppuluri Spamndana, Nirmala College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramesh S. Yamgar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hemant Sarin, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jhinuk Basu Mullick, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Plant Growth Regulators and Micronutrients on Growth, Flowering and Corm Production in Gladiolus (Gladiolus grandiflorus L.) cv. Nova Lux

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Talal Hafez, Damascus University, Syria.

(2) Kedir Yesuf Abdu, Wollo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Talal Hafez, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kedir Yesuf Abdu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Survey for the Incidence of Fusarium wilt in Sunhemp in the Regions of Dharwad and Haveri Districts of Karnataka

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Kavita Solanki, SAGE University, India.

(1) Akhilesh Kumar, JNKVV-KVK, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kavita Solanki, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Akhilesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on the Breeding Biology and Captive Rearing of Bracon brevicornis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Aminur Rahman, Jashore University of Science and Technology (JUST), Bangladesh.

(2) Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Osun State College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Isidro Humberto Almeyda León, National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research, México.

(1) M Giner, Spain.

(2) Prashant Kumar, K.S. Saket P.G. College, India.

(3) Md. Aminur rahman, jashore university of science and technology (just), bangladesh.

(4) Salwa Ezzat, Plant protection institute, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Aminur Rahman, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bello Olunike Adedoyin, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Implementing Payments for Ecosystem Services and its Impact on Community Livelihoods: A Case of Nyamwamba Sub-Catchment, Kasese District, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gopal Krishan, National Institute of Hydrology, India

Reviewers:

(1) Angelica Dobre, Romania.

(2) Martin Otundo Richard, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C J Jagadeesha , Karunya University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Th
Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Angelica Dobre, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Martin Otundo Richard, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Efficacy of Combi Fungicides for Management of Leaf Rust (Puccinia triticina Eriks.) in Wheat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, Senior Staff Scientist & Principal Researcher, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Malek Hassanpour, Osmania University, India.

(2) Ajay Sharma, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malek Hassanpour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajay Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Genetic Variability of F4 Progenies for Enhanced Pod Yield and Component Traits in Groundnut

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Hayder Ali Mohammed, Assistant Professor, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(2) Rekha Kumari, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rekha Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Long-term Variations in Albedo, Solar Flux, and Climatic Parameters in Burkina Faso (1984-2022)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bheemappa Suresha, The National Institute of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Zoltán Várallyay, Hungary.

(2) Muhammad Saqib Iqbal, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Th
Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zoltán Várallyay, Hungary) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Saqib Iqbal, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Probiotics as Potential Therapeutics for Managing COVID-19: Mechanisms and Implications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) M Furkan Korkmaz, University of Health Sciences, Türkiye.

(2) Ali A. Al-Hisnawi, Kerbala University, Iraq.

(3) Felipe Simões Lemos, Brazil.

(4) Wasif Hussain, University of Central Punjab, Pakistan.

(5) Maeesa Wadood, Baqai Medical University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Furkan Korkmaz, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali A. Al-Hisnawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Felipe Simões Lemos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Wasif Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Maeesa Wadood, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fungus Gnat a Common Contaminant of Insect Culture in Glasshouse and Protected Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Desh Deepak Chaudhary, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, India.

(2) Ishanu Mandal, JIS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Desh Deepak Chaudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ishanu Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA