Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Cheng-Fu Yang, National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustapha Sulaiman, Mewar University, India.

(2) Ali Yildirim, Harran University, Türkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustapha Sulaiman, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Yildirim, Türkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aaron Don M. Africa, De La Salle University, Philippines.

(2) Maiwan Bahjat Abdulrazzaq, University of Zakho, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aaron Don M. Africa, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maiwan Bahjat Abdulrazzaq, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepak Chandra Joshi, Central University, India.

(2) Suman Kumar Swarnkar, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, India.

(3) Pravin Ullagaddi, University of the Cumberlands, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arsh chanana, NIMS University Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepak Chandra Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suman Kumar Swarnkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pravin Ullagaddi, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) LY Cheikh Ahmed Tidiane, Senegal.

(2) Ahmed Kateb Jumaah Al-Nussairi, Al-Manara University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (LY Cheikh Ahmed Tidiane, Senegal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Kateb Jumaah Al-Nussairi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy  Mohy El-Din Afefy, Tanta University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Roberto P.L. Caporali, Italy.

(2) Piyush Raja, School of Computer Science & Information Technology, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roberto P.L. Caporali, Italy) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Piyush Raja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mariusz Cycoń, M.University of Silesia, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Yengkhom Linthoingambi Devi, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Marang Mosupiemang, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Botswana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yengkhom Linthoingambi Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marang Mosupiemang, Botswana) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jiabin Chen, Fuzhou University, China.

(2) Y Prabhavathi, S V Agricultural College, Acharya N G Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jiabin Chen, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Y Prabhavathi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Jiabin Chen, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kedir Oshone, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia.

(2) Rabach Vincent, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kedir Oshone, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rabach Vincent, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Lanzhuang Chen, Minami Kyushu University, Miyazaki, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Paul Alteo A. Bagabaldo, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines.

(2) Aqeel Johni Nassir, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paul Alteo A. Bagabaldo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aqeel Johni Nassir, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dean Markic, University Hospital Rijeka, Croatia.

(2) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Aristidis Galiatsatos, University of West Attica, Greece.

(2) Arshia Rashid Baig, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, India.

(3) Nusima Mohamed, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia.

(4) Durjoy Datta Mazumder, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aristidis Galiatsatos, Greece) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arshia Rashid Baig, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nusima Mohamed, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Durjoy Datta Mazumder, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA