Peer Review History: Diversity and Environmental Significance of Moss-Dwelling Testate Amoebae in Various Biotopes Around Nainital Lake, Uttarakhand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Bireshwar Bera, ST. Joseph’s College, India.

(2) Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bireshwar Bera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Varying Levels of Organic Manure, Phosphorus and Bio- inoculants on Biological Properties of Soil under Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Senior Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashutosh Gupta, C.S. Azad University of Agri. & Tech, India.

(2) Amit Kumar Jain, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashutosh Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Different Levels of Hydrogel on Root Nodulation in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Marwa M. El Sayed, Egypt.

(2) Subhas Chandra Tiwari, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavdyalay, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marwa M. El Sayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhas Chandra Tiwari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Medicinal Plants Used in the Traditional Treatment of Cancer in the District of Bamako, Mali

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaggali Saraswathi, Avanthi Degree and PG College, Osmania University, India.

(2) Pratap Chand Mali, University of Rajasthan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaggali Saraswathi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratap Chand Mali, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Brinjal’s Demonstration in Arunachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shamsun Naher, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Jitendra Singh Bamboriya, Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shamsun Naher, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jitendra Singh Bamboriya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Inter-community Conflicts on Beef Cattle Production among Pastoral Communities of Marsabit County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant professor, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alhassan Osman, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Md. Hemayatul Islam, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alhassan Osman, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md. Hemayatul Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship between Above-ground Biomass and Different Vegetation Indices of Tea Plantation of Alipurduar District, West Bengal, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien (Retired), The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) John Warren Reynolds, Canada.

(2) Ampee Tasung, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.15/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.50/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (John Warren Reynolds, Canada) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ampee Tasung, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rainfall Trend Analysis in Mysuru and Bengaluru Districts of Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Ranjan Kumar, College of Horticulture and Research Station, India.

(2) Shashikant Verma, NIT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Ranjan Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashikant Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Determining Seed Physiological Quality: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu Ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Kabiru Usman, Federal University, Nigeria.

(2) Ying Gu, Shenyang Agricultural University, China.

(3) Lachha Choudhary, SKRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kabiru Usman, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ying Gu, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lachha Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rifaximin and Metronidazole Fixed Dose Combination: New Treatment Option in the Management of Diarrhea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Amadi-Wali, Owhorchukwu, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Coulibaly Gaoussou, University Félix Houphoët-Boigny, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) A.K Jaiswal, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

(4) Celline Angel Sinaja, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia.

(5) Hussein Ali Naji, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(6) Olena Grechana, Zaporizhzhya State Medical and Pharmacy University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ambreen Asim, UTHealth Houston, USA.

(2) G.S. Lavekar, India.

(1) Hassan Shora, Port-Said University, Egypt.

(3) G.Kalaiselvi, TANUVAS, India.

(4) Silas Richard Kabhele, Seventh Day Adventist Church Of Tanzania, Tanzania.

(5) Uday Shankar Prasad, India.

(6) A.K. Jaiswal, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amadi-Wali, Owhorchukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Coulibaly Gaoussou, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A.K Jaiswal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Celline Angel Sinaja, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Hussein Ali Naji, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_6 (Olena Grechana, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA