Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Soraya Bakhshani, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Dilara Bulut Gokten, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Soraya Bakhshani, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dilara Bulut Gokten,Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Scicchitano Pietro, “F. Perinei” Hospital, Altamura (BA), Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ishtiyaq Masood, India.

(2) Michelle Viegas, Goa Medical College and Hospital, India.

(3) Jaswant Kaur, Dr. S.S. Tantia Medical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ishtiyaq Masood, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Michelle Viegas, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jaswant Kaur , India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asma Hanif, Assistant Professor, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Bingshati Singha Mahapatra, Bankura University, India.

(2) Amit Kumar Pandey, Mandan Bharti Agriculture College, India.

(3) Nishtha Srivastava, Invertis University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bingshati Singha Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nishtha Srivastava, India ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Kolawole Damilare Ogundeji, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

(2) Fauzie Rahman, Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia.

(3) Mazin Hajy, Cihan University Erbil, Rizgary Teaching Hospital, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kolawole Damilare Ogundeji, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fauzie Rahman, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mazin Hajy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Associate Professor, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Milkana Mochurova, Economic Research Institute at the Bulgarian Academy of  Sciences, Bulgaria.

(2) Mokshud Ali, Times University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

(3) Raj Vishnoi, Guru Nanak College of Nursing, India.

(4) Noorjan K .S, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences,( R.G.U.H.S ), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.375/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milkana Mochurova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mokshud Ali, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Raj Vishnoi , India ) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Noorjan K .S, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sarra Ben Rejeb, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunisia.

(2) Ebtihal Chiad Abbas, Kufa University, Iraq.

(3) Marvi, Sir Syed College of Medical Sciences for Girls, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sarra Ben Rejeb, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ebtihal Chiad Abbas, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marvi, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampan Rittidech, Mahasarakham Univesrsity, Thailand.

(2) Modestus Okwu, Federal University of Petroleum Resources Effurun, Nigeria.

(3) Jonandes Dias da Silva, UPE-POLI, Brazil.

(4) Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampan Rittidech, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Modestus Okwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jonandes Dias da Silva, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pankaj Balasaheb Gavali, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruchi Singh, NDVSU, India.

(2) Kamal Kumar, LUVAS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruchi Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamal Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Center for Integrative Conservation & Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests & Asian Elephant, Chinese Academy of Sciences,P.R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Tulasi Lakshmi Thentu, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Finland.

(2) Abdul Hadi Wasil, Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences and Technology University-ANASTU, Afghanistan.

(3) Sourakanti Sarkar, Seacom Skills University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tulasi Lakshmi Thentu, Finland) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Hadi Wasil, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sourakanti Sarkar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Siba Prasad Mishra, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amina Catherine Peter-Anyebe, Federal University of Lafia, Nigeria.

(2) Rhytheema Dulloo, School of Management, Hindustan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(3) Norliza Binti Samad, Aminuddin Baki Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amina Catherine Peter-Anyebe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rhytheema Dulloo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Norliza Binti Samad, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA