Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Gilbert Makanda, Central University of Technology, United Kingdom.

(2) Ashwini A. Waoo, AKS University, India,

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gilbert Makanda, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashwini A. Waoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Brain Research Center, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yusuf Hajara Oyiza, Nigeria.

(2) J. Vinoliya Josephine Mary, Holy Cross College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yusuf Hajara Oyiza, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Vinoliya Josephine Mary, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Assistant Professor, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aquib Nazar, School of Science, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

(2) Ali Zeeshan, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pakistan.

(3) Obianuju Chiamaka Emmanuel, National Horticultural Research Institute, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aquib Nazar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Zeeshan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Obianuju Chiamaka Emmanuel, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, Assistant professor, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexander Tristancho-Baró, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Spain.

(2) Manuela Cesaretti, Beaujon Hospital, France.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexander Tristancho-Baró, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manuela Cesaretti, France) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. G. Sudheer, GVP College of Engineering for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pranav Khare, Georgetown University, USA.

(2) Iftikhar Ahmad, Qurtuba University of Science and Information Technology, Pakistan.

(3) Renata Kubus, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pranav Khare, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Renata Kubus, Spain) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Senior Professor, Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Yahiaoui Amina Fatima Zahra, Saad Dahleb,Blida1 University, Algeria.

(2) Anurag Rawat, Himalayan Instittue of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yahiaoui Amina Fatima Zahra, Algeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anurag Rawat, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Akram, Associate Professor, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fehmi Mushtak Mukadam, GMC, Miraj, India.

(2) Abhishek Lachyan, AIIMS, India.

(3) Rajasekhar Reddy, St. Peter’s Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.13/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fehmi Mushtak Mukadam, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhishek Lachyan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajasekhar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Surapong Pinitglang, Assistant Professor, Dean, School of Science and Technology, University of the Thai Chamber of Commerce, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Amarjeer Kumar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Rohtas Mahila College, India.

(2) Sapana Jangral, Cluster University of Jammu, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amarjeer Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sapana Jangral, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emily Chepngetich Sitienei, Associate Professor, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Saleh Ali Nuri Abdalla, University of Alzzytuna, Libya.

(2) Anniejemijonafer F, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saleh Ali Nuri Abdalla, Libya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anniejemijonafer F, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nasser Mustapha, Senior Lecturer, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Khalil, Pakistan.

(2) H.S. M. Ovitigama, Regional English Support Centre, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Khalil, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H. S. M. Ovitigama, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA