Peer Review History: Pineapple Production and Its Marketing Channels in Bangladesh: Present Status, Prospects and Challenges

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Koffi Moïse Bienvenu Sodjinou, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

(2) Aimar Ridel Saviola Timban, Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Koffi Moïse Bienvenu Sodjinou, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aimar Ridel Saviola Timban, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating Existing Mobile Apps for Toddler Parenting: Recommendations for Future App Developers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

(2) Prof. Sivakumar Manickam, Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Brunei Darussalam.

Reviewers:

(1) Santosh Kumar Behera, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Zulkifly Bin Mohd Zaki, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Kishor S. Wagh, AISSMS IOIT, SPPU Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Santosh Kumar Behera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zulkifly Bin Mohd Zaki, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kishor S. Wagh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Banana Supply Chain in Navi Mumbai, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Credit Risk Manager, Banco Bpm, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Bryan Glomel S. Silverio, University of the Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bryan Glomel S. Silverio, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physicochemical Characterization of Oil and Chitosan Extracted from Cross Breed and Bivoltine Hybrid Silkworm Pupae: A Comparative Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Kumar Singh, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Lucknow, India.

(2) J. Johncy Caroline, Nirmala College for Women, India.

(3) B. Krishnamoorthy, Sanjivani College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prashant Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. Johncy Caroline, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B. Krishnamoorthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes for their Susceptibility against Pod Borers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Usman Mohammed Ishaq, Federal Polytechnic Monguno, Nigeria.

(2) Justin R Nayagam, Union Christian College, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Obie, State Islamic University of Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usman Mohammed Ishaq, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Justin R Nayagam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Increasing Incidence of Bee Stinging in Brazil: An Epidemiological Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vandana Avinash Badar, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, India.

(2) Doaa Abdel Wahab El Morsi, Mansoura University, Delta University for Science and Technology, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vandana Avinash Badar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Doaa Abdel Wahab El Morsi, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climatic Change Adaptation Strategies and Its Effectiveness in Relation to Buildings of Ayetoro Community, Ondo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, Associated Professor, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Yaregal Tilahun, Mizan-Tepi University, Ethiopia.

(2) K. Anandan, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dee M. Williams, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yaregal Tilahun, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Anandan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Modulation of BDNF Expression by Bryophyllum pinnatum Extract: Implications for Oxidative Stress and Cognitive Function in Pain-induced Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sai Kripa, United Arab Emirates.

(2) M Sivakumar, Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sai Kripa, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M Sivakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clothing and Accessories as a form of Artistic Expression

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Nithyaprakash V, Kumaraguru College of Technology, India.

(2) Nazlina Shaari, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Beatriz Estevez Esteve, Universidad de Granada, Spain.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nithyaprakash V, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nazlina Shaari, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Beatriz Estevez Esteve, Spain) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Nithyaprakash V, India)| File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Nazlina Shaari, Malaysia)| File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Beatriz Estevez Esteve, Spain)| File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Visible Light Induced Photodegradation of Methylene Blue Dye Over ZnO Modified α-Fe2O3 Nanocomposites

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Madogni VianouIrenee, Universited’ Abomey-Calavi (UAC), Benin.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Ayeshamariam, Khadir Mohideen College, India.

(2) Himansulal Nayak, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(3) Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Angelo Marcelo Tusset, Federal University of Technology, Brazil.

(2) Anju Tanwar, M.S.J .Govt. College, India.

(3) Frendi Maulana, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Lampung, Indonesia.

(4) R. Arunadevi, D. K. M. College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Ayeshamariam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himansulal Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA