Peer Review History: Growth and Biomass Distribution in Cocoa Varieties under Different Nitrogen Regimes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) M.C. Jain, College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Avneet Kaur Bajaj, Goswami Ganesh Dutta Sanatan Dharma College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. C. Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Avneet Kaur Bajaj, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Climate Change and Soil Fertility: A Review of Strategies for a Sustainable Food Security in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Assistant Professor, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Abu ktellah St., Hebron, Hebron, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Coulibaly Yacouba Noël, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Burkina Faso.

(2) Amelie L. Chico, University of Mindanao, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Coulibaly Yacouba Noël, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amelie L. Chico, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Organic Manures along with Microbial Consortia on Growth and Yield of Kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata Nees.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Mohidul Hasan, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Ledile Mankga, University of South Africa, South Africa.

(3) Efe M. Omwirhiren, Federal University College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Mohidul Hasan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ledile Mankga, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Efe M. Omwirhiren, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Md. Mohidul Hasan, Bangladesh)| File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Efe M. Omwirhiren, Nigeria)| File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2| File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nigeria’s Relations with the European Union: An Analysis of the Economic Partnership Agreement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Syeda Amtul Mahaboob, Osmania University, India.

(2) Lawin Laïfoya Moïse, Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syeda Amtul Mahaboob, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lawin Laïfoya Moïse, Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemical Analyses and Antibacterial Activities of Jatropha tanjorensis J. L. Ellis and Saroja Leaves Extract against Clinical Pathogens

Editor(s):

(1) Prof .Angélica Machi Lazarin, Professor, State University of Maringá, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexander I. Ikeuba, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

(2) Sumia Urainab, Government College University, Pakistan.

(3) S.Umamaheswari, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexander I. Ikeuba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sumia Urainab, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Umamaheswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Influence of Financial Literacy on Mobile Financial Service Usage: An Ordered Probit Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Associate Professor, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Anbuoli, Mannar Thirumalai Naicker College, India.

(2) Jin Cao, USA.

(3) Bindiya Tater, Medicaps University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Anbuoli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jin Cao, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bindiya Tater, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of CO 52 Rice Variety for Enhanced Productivity in Cuddalore District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Wenmark N. Magallon, School of Agriculture, Forestry and Environmental Studies, J.H. Cerilles State College, Philippines.

(2) Carlos Ricardo Trein, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wenmark N. Magallon, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Carlos Ricardo Trein, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil of Different Villages of District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Tesfalem Weldeslassie Ghebretnsae, Hamelmalo Agricultural College, Eritrea.

(2) Monika Joshi, RAJUVAS, India.

(3) Pradip Kumar Saini, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tesfalem Weldeslassie Ghebretnsae, Eritrea) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pradip Kumar Saini, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Character Association and Path Coefficient Analysis of Morphological Quantitative Traits in Ethiopian Kale (Brassica Carinata A.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Singh Sachan, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

(2) Pantipa Na Chiangmai, Silpakorn University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Singh Sachan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pantipa Na Chiangmai, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Thyroid Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Associate Professor, Dr. Moewardi General teaching Hospital, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

(2) Dr. Nicole D. Riddle, Associate Professor, USF Morsani COM,Tampa General Hospital, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) G.K Parvathidevi, Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Sri Sidhhartha Medical College, India.

(2) Sankara Malliga G, Anand Institute of Higher Technology, India.

(3) Inam Ullah Khan, Sarhad Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Sarhad university of Sciences & Information Technology, Pakistan.

(4) Priya P Kartha, KUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.62/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G.K Parvathidevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sankara Malliga G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Inam Ullah Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Priya P Kartha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Sankara Malliga G, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA