Category Archives: Review History

Peer Review History: Synergizing Random Forest and K Means Algorithms: An Analytical Study for Precise Crop Recommendation in Southeast Asia

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Md Mahfuzul Islam Shamim, Bangladesh.

(2) R.Bhavani, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md Mahfuzul Islam Shamim, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Bhavani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: A Review of the Impact of Impounded Rivers in KSA and as an Assessment of their Potential for Hydroelectric Power Generation

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Survesh Saini, India.

(2) Asim Qayyum Butt, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Survesh Saini, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asim Qayyum Butt, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Assessing the Effectiveness of Network Security Tools in Mitigating the Impact of Deepfakes AI on Public Trust in Media

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rajendra Prasad Devathoti, St. Ann’s College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Dr. Faisal, Lecturer, Sohar University, Oman.

Reviewers:

(1) Suryavanshi Arti Prashant, Savitribai Pule Pune University, India.

(2) A.Vani Lavanya, St.Joseph’s Institute of Technology, India.

(3) Bhawani Singh Rathore, Manipal University Jaipur, India.

(4) Yevseiev, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine.

(5) Lavanya Sanapala, GITAM Deemed to be University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suryavanshi Arti Prashant, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. Vani Lavanya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bhawani Singh Rathore, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Yevseiev, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Lavanya Sanapala, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Advanced Battery Management: Forecasting Health, State of Charge & Maintenance Needs Using AI & ML Models (LSTM, Gradient Boosting, SVR, Random Forest)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Lima Nascimento, Institute of Physics, University of Brasilia, Brazil.

(2) Rasheed N. Abed, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

(3) Raheel Muzzammel, University of Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniel Lima Nascimento, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rasheed N. Abed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Raheel Muzzammel, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Study of the Potential Toxicity and Side Effects Associated with the Long-term Consumption of Walnuts (Cola verticillata: Sterculiaceae): Anti-Meiosis in the Insect Assay

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Yetunde Olawuyi, Prairie View A&M University, USA.

(2) Bouchiha Hanene, Echahid Cheikh Lari Tebessi Tebessa University, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yetunde Olawuyi, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bouchiha Hanene, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Influence of Organic Manure and Inorganic Fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.)

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Godwin Asoconom Allems, Kaduna State College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Fatemeh Aghaei, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Godwin Asoconom Allems, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatemeh Aghaei, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Determination of the Coefficients “a” and “b” of the K-R Relationship for Accurate Measurement of Water Quantity Using Cellular Links in Burkina Faso

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aditya Kumar Singh, Noida International University, India.

(2) Pooja Verma, Sikkim Manipal University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aditya Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja Verma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Study on Different AKIS Actors on Agricultural Knowledge and Information Dissemination

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Amal Hegazi Ahmed Elrefaei, Hot Lab and Waste Management Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Wong, Wong Ming, Krirk University, Thailand.

(2) Monica Ocnean, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wong, Wong Ming, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monica Ocnean, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Optimizing Input Management Practices for Sustainable Maize Production

Posted on by

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shiva Prasad Adhikari, IAAS, Nepal.

(2) Meenu Prajapati, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(3) W U L Ambagaspitiya, Lincoln University, Sri Lanka.

(4) Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shiva Prasad Adhikari, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Meenu Prajapati, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (W U L Ambagaspitiya, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA