Peer Review History: Calibration and Validation of Semi-distributed Model of Monthly Stream Discharge Using SUFI-2 Algorithm for Shimsha Catchment, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Teresa Lopez-Lara, Autonomous University of Queretaro, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Reza Zamani Nouri, Islamic Azad University of Iran, Iran.

(2) Nader Jandaghi, Gonbad Kavous University, Iran.

(3) Zhangu Wang, College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alireza Reza Zamani Nouri, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nader Jandaghi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Zhangu Wang, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hypercyclicity Criterion on Basic Elementary Operator

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Hasan Hadi, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Simon Joseph, University of Bahr El- Ghazal, South Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manimekalai S, Dr. N.G.P Arts and Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafa Hasan Hadi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simon Joseph, South Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Studies on the Effect of Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield and Quality Parameters of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.) c.v. Azad Bhindi-1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihaela Lungu, National Research and Development Institute for soil Science, Romania.

(2) Subhrasini Lenka, OUAT, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mihaela Lungu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhrasini Lenka, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Implementation of National Land Policy and Industrial Development in Tanzania: Highlights from Mbeya Region

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia and Institute of Construction and Transport Infrastructure, Kuban State Technological University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustaquim, Aliah University, India.

(2) Mayank Pandey, Guru Ghasidas Central University, India.

(3) Divya Prakash Mohabey, National Institute of Technology, India.

(4) Prasang Harji Rank, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(5) Priyanka Gupta, NIET, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Gupta, NIET Greater Noida, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustaquim, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mayank Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Divya Prakash Mohabey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Prasang Harji Rank, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Priyanka Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Sowing Dates and Nitrogen Levels on Growth, Yield, Quality and Economics of Fodder Maize (Zea mays L.) SFM 1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Elabbas Doka Mohamed Ali, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

(2) Lubna Ahmed Soomro, University of Sindh, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Elabbas Doka Mohamed Ali, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lubna Ahmed Soomro, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Various Porcine Byproducts in Canine Diet Formulation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fabio da Costa Henry, Associate Professor, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, UENF, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) M. V. Dass Prakash, Sri Sankara Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, UFRJ, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Manfred Doepp, Switzerland, Head.

(2) Samad Sheikh, ICAR- Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. V. Dass Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Proanthocyanidins and Dental Health: Uncovering the Benefits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, College of Business, Texas Woman’s University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Vasanthakumari, Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Srinidhi S R, Dr D Y Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Arshia Rashid Baig, Sharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Vasanthakumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srinidhi S R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Arshia Rashid Baig, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Simulation and Analysis of the Dynamics of 2K-V Reducer Based on RecurDyn

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) T. Lakshmibai, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa MahaVidyalaya (SCSVMV), India.

(2) Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Unicamp, Brazil.

(3) Saif Ali Kadhim, University of Technology, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.167/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T. Lakshmibai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gabriel Gomes De Oliveira, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saif Ali Kadhim, Iraq) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Synergy of Molecular Docking and Bioinformatics: An in Depth Review in Drug Discovery

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Head (Retired), School of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shambhu Sarkar, United States.

(2) Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Galih Satrio Putra, State University of Malang, Indonesia.

(2) R. R. Thenge, Dr. Rajendra Gode College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shambhu Sarkar, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abu Md Ashif Ikbal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Assessment of Histopathological and Biochemical Indices of Renal Function in Alloxan-induced Male and Female Diabetic Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Janvier Gasana, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Samriti Vohra, Gandhi College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Masumi Kamiyama, Jumonji University, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samriti Vohra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Masumi Kamiyama, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA