Peer Review History: High Density Soil Survey of CRC -1 by the Use of Laboratory Methods

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Denis M. K. Amara, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

(2) Praveen Kumar, Swami Vivekanand Government College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Denis M. K. Amara, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Praveen Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigating the Impact of Senna alata Extract on Hematology and Histopathology of Juvenile of Clarias gariepinus

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sérgio Thode Filho, Associate Professor, Multidisciplinary Waste Management Laboratory, Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hadi Hamli, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Alwinpeter M, College of Fisheries Science, Kamdhenu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hadi Hamli, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alwinpeter M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Heavy Metal and Microbial Quality of Five Herbal Medicinal Concoctions Sold in Anambra State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. D.B. Jani, Associate Professor, Government Engineering College, Dahod, Gujarat Technological University GTU, India.

(2) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, Associate Professor, National university of Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Nketia Anthony, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) Deepak Yadav, University of Delhi, India.

(3) N. Muthu lakshmi Andal, PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, India.

(4) Nimmy V S, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nketia Anthony, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N. Muthu lakshmi Andal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nimmy V S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (N. Muthu lakshmi Andal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Impact of Agricultural Subsidies on farm Profitability and Sustainability

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Monica Ocnean, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania.

(2) Simpa Ondeku James, Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa, Nigeria.

(3) Tawoos  Mohammed Kamel Ahmed, Kirkuk University, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monica Ocnean, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simpa Ondeku James, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tawoos Mohammed Kamel Ahmed, Iraq/strong>) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mechanosensitive Channels: Utilising the Bacterial Cell’s Defence Mechanism against It

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Tenured Associate Professor, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Heather S. Deter, Concordia University Chicago, United States of America.

(2) Dhivagar. K, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, India.

(3) Ram Krishna Shrestha, Pokhara University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Heather S. Deter, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhivagar. K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ram Krishna Shrestha, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Design of Drip Emitters by Evaluating Hydraulic and Manufacturing Performance of Online Drip Emitters

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ihom P. Aondona, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(2) Shivam Singh, Indian Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ihom P. Aondona, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivam Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Ecosystem Health: A Comparative Study Using Water Quality Index Analysis across Ten Lotic System in the Cross River System

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Associate Professor, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ritu Bir, Delhi College of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Majedul Hoque, Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh.

(3) Neeta Kumar, ICMR, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ritu Bir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Majedul Hoque, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Neeta Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection among Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Patients Attending the Gynaecology Clinic of a Private Tertiary Hospital in Ogun State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rômulo Dias Novaes, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Federal University of Alfenas, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Calvin Ncha Oyong Akom, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(2) Izaidino Jaime Muchanga, University of Porto, Mozambique.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Calvin Ncha Oyong Akom, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Izaidino Jaime Muchanga, Mozambique) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Compelling Classroom Accumulation and Harmonious Teaching of Public Elementary School Teachers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Assistant Professor, UIDEF – Instituto da Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Margaret Stevani, Universitas Pembinaan Masyarakat, Indonesia.

(2) Adesola Afolayan Olayinka, Africa Research University, Eswatini.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Margaret Stevani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adesola Afolayan Olayinka, Eswatini) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Pinching on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) Varieties in Chitwan, Nepal

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Lompo Ounyambila, University of Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Burkina Faso.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lompo Ounyambila, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA