Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampa Das, Bose Institute, India.

(2) Manoj Kumar Sharma, Janta Vedic College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampa Das, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Agwu, Ani Ekwe, Federal Polytechnic Ngodo Isuochi Abia State, Nigeria.

(2) Mwesigwa Robert, National Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), Uganda.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agwu, Ani Ekwe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mwesigwa Robert, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sameh Awad, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaishnavi Gupta, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences and Technology, India.

(2) Paul Joae Brett Nito, Universitas Sari Mulia, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaishnavi Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Paul Joae Brett Nito, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ferial Mohamed Abu- Salem, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Kainat Nisar, The University of Haripur, Pakistan.

(2) Gamal Saad Elhadidy, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kainat Nisar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gamal Saad Elhadidy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Central Lab. for Research and Development of Date Palm, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Prof. Levent Son, School of Silifke, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

(4) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ninoska Margarita Paz Palacios, Universidad Bolivarianan de Venezuela, Venezuela.

(2) Satyavani Godavarthi, India.

(3) Jyoti Singh, A.K.T.U., India.

(4) Anand Gautam, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(5) Jabrah Rafi, Higher Institute for Applied Science and Technology, Syria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ninoska Margarita Paz Palacios, Venezuela) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satyavani Godavarthi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jyoti Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Anand Gautam, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Jabrah Rafi, Syria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_4_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Alireza Allameh, Rice Research Institute of Iran, Iran.

(2) Narayan Khatri, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alireza Allameh, Iran) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narayan Khatri, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Journal change | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Draghici Elena Maria, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Khem Raj Pant, Nepal.

(3) Bakht-un-Nisa Mangan, Sindh Agriculture University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Draghici Elena Maria, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khem Raj Pant, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bakht-un-Nisa Mangan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmet Turhan, Mustafakemalpasa Vocational School, The University of Uludag, Turkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Mooatasim Daood S. Agha, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Mahmoud Okasha, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(3) Withaya Puangsombut, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mooatasim Daood S. Agha, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahmoud Okasha, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Withaya Puangsombut, Thailand) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) El Hafi Tarik, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Morocco.

(2) Ganesh Basawaraj Birajadar, FTCCOER, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (El Hafi Tarik, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ganesh Basawaraj Birajadar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Caroline Agamala Kundu, International Fertilizer Development Centre, Kenya.

(2) Noor Fatima, Lahore College for Women University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.95/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Caroline Agamala Kundu, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Noor Fatima, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA