Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jaya Bishwal, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Yuvarani, Auxilium College, India.

(2) Nemani. Subadra, Geethanjali College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(3) Mohamed. S. Hamed, Gulf Colleges, KSA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Yuvarani, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nemani. Subadra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohamed. S. Hamed, KSA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

(2) Dr. S. M. Aqil Burney, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(3) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, University of Guyana, India.

(2) Amaury de Souza, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

(3) Fasna K, University of Calicut, India.

(4) Jaber Kazempoor, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 5.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amaury de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Fasna K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jaber Kazempoor, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Amaury de Souza, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_3_v1 (Fasna K, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_4_v1 (Jaber Kazempoor, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v2 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v3 (Vincent Raja Anthonisamy, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rehenuma Tabassum, Associate Professor & Chairman, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Kousik Boro, Bodoland University, India.

(2) Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Centro Universitário Vale do Cricaré, Brazil.

(3) Yiming He, South China University of Technology, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kousik Boro, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Giovanni Guimarães Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yiming He, China) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Endang Tri Wahyuni, Gadhah Mada University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

(2) Agnes Nandutu Masawi, Makerere University, Ugnada.

(3) Rupali Likhar, University of Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Agnes Nandutu Masawi, Ugnada) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rupali Likhar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, Associate Professor, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Apu Biswas, Bangladesh Tea Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Kehinde R. Adebayo, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Apu Biswas, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kehinde R. Adebayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(2) Margarita Išoraitė, Vilniaus Kolegija, Lithuania.

(3) Maria Daniela Chavez Clemente, National Institute for Agricultural Technology, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Margarita Išoraitė, Lithuania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maria Daniela Chavez Clemente, Argentina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Florin Sala, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, Central Agricultural University, Pasighat, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Florin Sala, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wang Guangjun, Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mummasani Asritha, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Zafar Iqbal Khan, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mummasani Asritha, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zafar Iqbal Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Jitendra Patel, Gmers Medical College, India.

(2) Sahar Youssef, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jitendra Patel, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sahar Youssef, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Zahra Shirmohammadi, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Iran.

(2) Alifia Hamzah Johari, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zahra Shirmohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alifia Hamzah Johari, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA