Peer Review History: Estimates of Genetic Variability for Yield Its Component Trait in Urdbean (Vigna mungo L.) Germplasm

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim Farah, College of Science Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Ramya, TNAU, India.

(2) Mihir A. Hansalia, N. M. College of Agriculture, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Ramya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mihir A. Hansalia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biophysical Studies with Liquid Model Systems during the Conditions of Electric Corona Discharge and NaCl Solution

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bheemappa Suresha, The National Institute of Engineering, India.

(2) Prof. Thomas F. George, Chancellor Emeritus, University of Missouri-St. Louis, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparajita Chakraborty, St. Xavier’s College, India.

(2) Pulipati Sowjanya, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

(3) Dattatraya D Kulkarni, India.

(3) Aja. M, Sree Krishna College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparajita Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pulipati Sowjanya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dattatraya D Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Aja. M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Rapeseed-Mustard Genotypes for Resistance to Mustard Aphid Infestation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Krishna Kumar, Mangalayatan University, India.

(2) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University, India.

(3) Longjam Boris Singh, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krishna Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyanka Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Longjam Boris Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Improved Crop Management Practices in Rabi Groundnut through Frontline Demonstrations in Nagarkurnool District, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhsin Yimam, Ethiopia.

(2) Dhanya Punnoli, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhsin Yimam, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dhanya Punnoli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Level, Challenges Perceived by Traders in the Functioning and Price Variation of Apple Marketing through e-NAM in Sant Kabir Nagar District of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bishun Deo Prasad, Assistant Professor, Bihar Agriculture College, Sabour, Bihar Agricultural University, Bihar, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sajad Ali, Government Post Graduate College of Management Sciences, Pakistan.

(2) Nitu Kumari, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Amar Vijay Jamnekar, Ssmita Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sajad Ali, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nitu Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amar Vijay Jamnekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Response to Diuron Applied at the 3- and 4- Leaf Pair Stage of Development

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Usman Ahmad, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Shahid Hassan, Government Graduate College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usman Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Shahid Hassan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biomechanical Assessment of Patients with Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Zoran Todorovic, University of Belgrade  And University Medical Center “Bezanijska kosa”, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya N Pai, K.S. Hegde Medical Academy, NITTE (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Ivet Koleva, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya N Pai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ivet Koleva, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Functional Mobility Assessment after Unilateral Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study of Two Prosthesis Types

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla-Raygoza, Directorate of Teaching and Research, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Gomasa, Asian Health Care Foundation, India.

(2) Varagani srinivasarao, Viswabharathi super speciality hospital, NTR University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahesh Gomasa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Varagani srinivasarao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Therapeutic of the Standardized Dry Extract of Rhodiola rosea in Physical Activity Practiotioners

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sinan Ince, Afyon Kocatepe University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Raju Dubaji Rathod, Shree Ambabai Talim Sanstha’s Diploma in Pharmacy College, India.

(2) D. Varalakshmi, Apollo College of Physiotherapy, India.

(3) Diaa Elden Mohammed Ahmed Elmradny, Alsalam University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raju Dubaji Rathod, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Varalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Diaa Elden Mohammed Ahmed Elmradny, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Generalized Odontodysplasia: A Rare Case with 19-Year Follow-up

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Adesh S Manchanda, SGRD-IDSR, India.

(2) Saurabh Nagar, Tata Memorial Centre, India.

(3) Sumana C K, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental sciences and Hospital, India.

(4) Soraya Bakhshani, Dental School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adesh S Manchanda, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saurabh Nagar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sumana C K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Soraya Bakhshani, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA