Peer Review History: Prediction and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. M. Chitra, Lecturer, Government Siddha Medical College, India.

(2) Dr. Lokendra Bahadur Sapkota, Assistant Professor, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.

(3) Prof. Aurora Martinez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Yasmine M. Tabra, Al Nahrain University, College of Information Engineering, Iraq.

(2) Muhammad Bilal, Sheikh Khalifa Hospital, United Arab Emirates.

(3) Wael Maher, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

(4) Volker Rudat, Jiahui International Cancer Center, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yasmine M. Tabra, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Bilal, United Arab Emirates) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wael Maher, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Volker Rudat, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome Caused by Neurofibroma in the Elbow: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Robert Meves, Santa Casa Scholl of Medicine, São Paulo University, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Sharareh Roshanzamir, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

(2) Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant, K. J. Somaiya Medical College, University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sharareh Roshanzamir, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sharadkumar Pralhad Sawant, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adoption of Digital Technologies for the Management of Repeat Breeder Cows in the Dairy Herds of Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, Assistant Professor, College of Agriculture, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratnamala Bhimanpallewar, VIIT, India.

(2) Vaibhav S. Narwane, Somaiya Vidyavihar University, India.

(3) Ashis Kumar Ghosh, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratnamala Bhimanpallewar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vaibhav S. Narwane, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashis Kumar Ghosh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gender Differences in Perceptions of Corruption: Insights from Bhutan

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Mahalakshmi, Guru Shree Shantivijai Jain College for Women, India.

(2) Imoke Marcellinus Ajah, Federal College of Education Eha-Amufu, Nigeria.

(3) Maru Abebaw Berhanu, ECSU, Ethiopia.

(4) Hanumanthappa DG, Rani Channamma University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Mahalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imoke Marcellinus Ajah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Maru Abebaw Berhanu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hanumanthappa DG, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Different Level of Nitrogen and Foliar Application of Nano Zinc on Physico-chemical Properties of Soil in Wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) Var. PWB-373

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Melissa R. Medina, College of Agriculture, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

(2)  Essam Samir Soliman, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Melissa R. Medina, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Essam Samir Soliman, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Machine Learning Applications and Their Predictive Solutions in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suprakash Pal, Regional Research Station, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Chavula Petros, Haramaya University, Ehtiopia.

(2) Piyush Raja, School of Computer Science & Information Technology, Lingaya’s Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chavula Petros, Ehtiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Piyush Raja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case of Leiomyosarcoma of the Femoral Artery; Rare Location and Management at an Advanced Stage

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, School of Life Science, Xuzhou Normal University, Xuzhou City, China.

Reviewers:

(1) A. K. Manickavasuki, PSG Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, India.

(2) Muzna Suhail, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, Akhtar Saeed College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. K. Manickavasuki, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muzna Suhail, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Assessment of the Epidemiology and In vitro Susceptibility of Giardia lamblia Trophozoites and Cysts to a Variety of Plant Extracts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunny Dhiman, Chandigarh College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Anthony Dawet, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(3) Mansoor Azeem Siddiqui, United states of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunny Dhiman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Dawet, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mansoor Azeem Siddiqui, United states of America) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of “Extreme Poverty” for the special Region of Yogyakarta in Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, Senior Lecturer, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) M. V. Ashok, India.

(2) Chanam Sonia Devi, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M. V. Ashok, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chanam Sonia Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Pharmacognostic Characteristics, Antioxidant Potential, and Anticholinesterase Activity of Piliostigma thonningii (Schum.) Milne-Redh.: Implications for Neuroprotection and Cognitive Health

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sachin Kumar Jain, Principal, Oriental College of Pharmacy & Research, Oriental University, MP, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyotiram A. Sawale, Krishna institute of Pharmacy, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Shrinivas K Sarje, Nanded Pharmacy College, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

(3) Shiva Prasad Mohanty, Monark University, India.

(4) Rabia Ayoubi, Kabul University, Afghanistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyotiram A. Sawale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shrinivas K Sarje, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shiva Prasad Mohanty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Rabia Ayoubi, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA