Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Use of Manures and Fertilizers on Physico-chemical Properties of Soil and Yield of Coconut (Cocos nucifera L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Senior Lecturer, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) B. Zawilski, France.

(2) Repalle Naganna, National Institute of Plant Health Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joachim Noch Karel Dumais, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B. Zawilski, France) | File 1 | Na


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Repalle Naganna, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Ragi Yield: The Effect of Organic Seed Priming

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Hakimeh Oloumi, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Iran.

(2) Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shashi Prakash Vishwakarma, India.

(2) Wael Fahmi Abdulrahman Alshamary, Kirkuk University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hakimeh Oloumi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mgbasonwu Vincent Nwabinye, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Nutrient Content and their Uptake by Mung Bean Crop (Vigna radiata L.) under Mid Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Firdoz Shahana, PJTSAU, India.

(2) Sowmya M N, JSS Ayurveda Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firdoz Shahana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sowmya M N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microwave-assisted Synthesis of Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles with Carica papaya Leaf Extract and their Catalytic Activities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Associate Professor, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Kemal Mohammed Gendo, Wallaga University, Ethiopia.

(2) Mohammed Naser Hussein, Afak General Hospital, Iraq.

(3) Antony Lawrence Andrews, School of Natural & Physical Sciences, The University of Papua New Guinea, Papua New Guinea.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Abila Jeba Queen, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Muslimin, Tadulako University, Indonesia.

(3) Yuri Vinicius Bruschi de Santana, Federal Technological University of ParanĂ¡, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kemal Mohammed Gendo, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammed Naser Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Antony Lawrence Andrews, Papua New Guinea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Vine Management on Yield and Quality Parameters of Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, Coimbatore, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Mekidani Jacob Salu, University of Georgia, United States of America.

(2) Gatbel Buony Nyuot, Gambella University, Ethiopia.

(3) Jomsen Jini, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mekidani Jacob Salu, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gatbel Buony Nyuot, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jomsen Jini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relative Performance of Rice Varieties under Drip Irrigated Dry Direct-seeded and Flood Irrigated Transplanted Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Assistant Professor, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Usman Mohammed Ishaq, Federal Polytechnic Monguno, Nigeria.

(2) Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Universite Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) W U L Ambagaspitiya, Lincoln University, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Usman Mohammed Ishaq, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hantanirina Herisoa Isabelle, Madagascar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Measure Constraints Faced by Farm Women Using ICT Tools by Garett Ranking Method

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajun Purwanto, Institute of Teacher Training and Education, Indonesia.

(2) Beatrice Zgawa Luhanga Mbakaya, Mzuzu University, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajun Purwanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Beatrice Zgawa Luhanga Mbakaya, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Rare Case Report of Intrabdominal Fibrosarcoma in a German Shepherd Dog

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Shunpu Zhang, University of Central Florida, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Noah Ewoti Olive Vivien, University of Yaounde 1, Cameroon.

(2) Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, UFRJ, UFRA, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hadaf Hashem Mohammed, University of Baghdad – College of Veterinary Medicine, Iraq.

(2) Hassan Nima Habib, University of Basrah, College of Agriculture, Iraq.

(3) Luca Iasmina, Romania.

(4) Matsyagandha Kishanrao Patil, COVAS, Udgir, MAFSU, Nagpur, India.

(5) Om Singh, ICAR- Deemed Unversity, India.

(6) Zeinab Alywe Mohammed Al-Tememe, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noah Ewoti Olive Vivien, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raquel Soares Casaes Nunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Variation in Leaf Biochemical Compositon of Guava (Psidium guajava L) Hybrids

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ir. Chairuddin, STMIK IM, Indonesia.

(2) Ankit Kumar Jangid, Government College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ir. Chairuddin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankit Kumar Jangid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of New Generation Herbicide-based Weed Management Strategies on Direct Sown Rice Production in Cauvery Deltaic Zone

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Bilal Ahmad Khan, Texas A&M University, USA.

(2) Zulmardi, Universitas Muhammadiyah, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bilal Ahmad Khan, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zulmardi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v3 | File 1 | NA