Peer Review History: Design and Analysis of the Impact of Ultraviolet Aging on the Mechanical Properties and Durability of PLA Lattice Structures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, Associate Professor, National university of Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Shwetank Parihar, IIT [ISM], India.

(2) Daniel Devaraj L, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shwetank Parihar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel Devaraj L, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Resource Use Pattern, Efficiency and Constraints in Onion Production: A Special Reference to Haveri District, Karnataka, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ajay Kumar Prusty, M S Swaminathan School of Agriculture, Centurion University of Technology & Management, India.

(2) K. Anny Mrudhula, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajay Kumar Prusty, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Anny Mrudhula, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Styrene Gas Leak Incident Analysis in Vishakapatnam: Event Tree Analysis, Root Cause Analysis and Threat Zone Determination Using ALOHA Software’’

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, Retired Professor, The State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, Distinguished Professor/Vice President, National United University (NUU), Taiwan, President of Taiwan Group on Earth Observations (TGEO), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. R. Saranya, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Jitendra Sunte, Lingaraj Appa Engineering College, India.

(3) Saurabh Pradeep Joshi, Shri Sant Gajanan Maharaj College of Engineering, India.

(4) Norbertus Krisnu Prabowo, State University of Jakarta, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. R. Saranya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jitendra Sunte, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Saurabh Pradeep Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Norbertus Krisnu Prabowo, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mulberry Leaf Powder as Protein Alternative for Poultry: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, Associate Professor, California State Polytechnic University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihai- Iacob Bențea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mihai- Iacob Bențea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khalid Chillab Kridie Al-Salhie, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Career Development and Employee Performance in Public Sector Organizations in Tanzania: A Case of Kondoa District Council

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayhan Karakaş, Bartin University, Türkiye.

(2) Juwita, Bina Bangsa University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayhan Karakaş, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juwita, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Protective Effects of Terminalia superba Engl. & Diels (Combretaceae) on Aluminium Chloride-Induced Reproductive Toxicity and Oxidative Stress in Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sachin Kumar Jain, Principal, Oriental College of Pharmacy & Research, Oriental University, MP, India.

(2) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Bindiya Barsola, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University, India.

(2) Satish S, Srinivas College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Joyamma John, St. Thomas College, Hemchand Yadav University, India.

(4) S. G. Antony Godson, Hindusthan College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bindiya Barsola, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satish S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Joyamma John, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (S. G. Antony Godson, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Growth and Variability in Major Fruit Spice Cultivation and Export from India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammad Reza Naroui Rad, Sistan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Al-Mamun, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, College of Horticulture & Forestry, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Al-Mamun, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Dhar Hatai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy and Economics of New Insecticides and Botanicals for Jassid Control in Mung Bean (Vigna radiata, L. Wilczek)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Alejandro Gorrer, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Argentina.

(2) Robert, Universitéd’ Orléans, France.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniel Alejandro Gorrer, Argentina) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Robert, France) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Soil Test Crop Response Based Fertilizer Prescriptions for Achieving Target Yields of Linseed in Varanasi, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nazimah Maqbool, Retired Professor, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sopialena, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(2) Sandhya Amol Jagtap, Mudhoji College Phaltan, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sopialena, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandhya Amol Jagtap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimation of Available Protein Content in Different Tissues of Mulberry Silkworm Larva (Bombyx mori L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Umer Hameed Shansaz, Cluster University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Biplab Kumar Das, Jengraimukh College, India.

(3) Shaikh Tarannum Tanveer, Maulana Azad College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umer Hameed Shansaz, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Biplab Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shaikh Tarannum Tanveer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA