Peer Review History: Emamectin Benzoate 1.9 EC and 5 SG: A Safer Insecticide to Predatory Spiders of Bhendi [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Anjan Kumar Nayak, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Parthasarathi R, Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College & Research Institute, TNAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anjan Kumar Nayak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Parthasarathi R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Analysis of Stability and Data Dependency for a Novel Jungck-type Iterative Algorithm

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Assistant Professor, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Kiranbhai Dodiya, Gujarat University, India.

(2) A. B. Sviridenko, Kuban State University, Russia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) J. Vinothkumar, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Kirti Gupta, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

(3) Kiran Dewangan, Government Dudhadhari Bajrang Girls’ P.G. College, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kiranbhai Dodiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A. B. Sviridenko, Russia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Copper Corrosion by Biogas: Impact of Purification with Activated Carbon and Biochar Derived from Cocoa POSD Waste

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ho Soon Min, Centre for Green Chemistry and Applied Chemistry, INTI International University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Ramamoorthy, Pondicherry University, India.

(2) Mehrdad Adl, Materials and Energy Research Center, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Undie, David Akpanke, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Ramamoorthy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mehrdad Adl, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fungal and Physicochemical Characterisation of Wastewater Treatment Using Charcoal and Corn Husk as Filter Materials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Claudia Coelho, Assistant Professor, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ikhumetse Agatha Abamhekhelu, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Ravikant Singh, Swami Vivekanand University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Idris Abdullahi Dabban, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

(2) Ranjan Singh, Dr. Ramnaohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ikhumetse Agatha Abamhekhelu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ravikant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding Psychological Contract Breach in Clinical Psychology Internships: A Thematic Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Pongsiri Kamkankaew, North-Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

(2) Maria Jacinta Pereira Dantas, Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Portugal.

(3) Isaac Tweneboah Agyei, AAMUSTED, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pongsiri Kamkankaew, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maria Jacinta Pereira Dantas, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Isaac Tweneboah Agyei, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Wheat Cultivars to Water Deficit in North Nile Delta

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Waleed Mohamed Bassuny Yehia, Cotton Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Bader Ijaz, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Salih Kadhum Alwan Alsharifi, Al Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Waleed Mohamed Bassuny Yehia, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bader Ijaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quantification and Analysis of Human Errors Across the Life Cycle of Electrical Installations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, All Saints’ College, India.

(2) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Prabhakar N. Kota, MES’S Wadia College of Engineering, India.

(2) Ir. Aris Sarjito, Republic of Indonesia Defense University (RIDU), Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhakar N. Kota, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ir. Aris Sarjito, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised MS v2 and Feedback v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ultrafilters and Their Dual Relationship to Tree-width in Graph Theory

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Qasim Mohsin Luhaib, Iraq.

(2) Ali Shojaei-Fard, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amor Hasic, University of Novi Pazar, Serbia.

(2) Cyrus F. Nourani, Simon Fraser University, Canada.

(3) Hamideh Rashidi, University of Jiroft, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qasim Mohsin Luhaib, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Shojaei-Fard, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Crossandra (Crossandra infundibuliformis (L.) (Nees.) Genotypes for Root Lesion Nematode

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammed Bukar Aji, Modibbo Adama University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Sunil Balu Avhad, Annasaheb Vartak College of Arts, Malhotra College of Commerce and Andrades College of Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Saadoon, Saadoon Murad, Al-Qadisiyah University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammed Bukar Aji, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunil Balu Avhad, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Somatic Hybrids and Cybrids: Innovations in Vegetable Improvement

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, Rajshahi University, Bangladesh.

(2) T. Sabesan, Annamalai Univeristy, India.

(3) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anupam Adarsh, Nalanda College of Horticulture Noorsarai,Bihar Agricultural University Sabour, India.

(2) Dibakar Panda, Visva Bharati University, India.

(3) Hera Oana, Romania.

(4) Mahfut, Lampung University, Indonesia.

(5) Patel Ravikumar Dipakbhai, India.

(6) Pradeep Kumar, ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute Jhansi, India.

(7) S. Ranjith Raja Ram, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Taufiqur Rahman Sarkar, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T. Sabesan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mahfut, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA