Peer Review History: Treatment Efficacy of Groundwater by Electromagnetic Polarization

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Dan Cirjan, Oil-Gas University Ploiesti, Romania.

(2) Mahdi Karkush, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akbar Eghbali, Tarbiat Modarres University, Iran.

(2) N’dri Seiny Roger, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) Richa Tiwari, R.T.M. Nagpur University, India.

(4) Samta Singh, K.S. Saket P.G. College, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dan Cirjan, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahdi Karkush, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Attributes and Consumer Acceptability of Chinchin Produced from Blends of Rice, Cowpea, and Sweet Potato Flours

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Parthkumar Sapariya, Gujarat Technological University, India.

(2) J. M. Koli, DBSKKV, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Awadhesh Kumar Yadav, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, India.

(2) Nikhil Digambar Solanke, Govt. College of Food Technology, Yavatmal, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Parthkumar Sapariya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (J. M. Koli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing Extension and Advisory Service Delivery Dynamics in Nepal through Social Network Analysis Lens: A Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rajesh Kumar, Assistant Professor, College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (LUVAS), India.

Reviewers:

(1) Radwa M Ata, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Kallanagouda Patil, SVKM’s Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (NMIMS) Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Aditya Sinha, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

 

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radwa M Ata , Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kallanagouda Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aditya Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Occupational Health Challenges Faced by Farm Women during Brinjal Harvesting in Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Assistant Professor, Gomal University,  Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aseh Vitung Emmanuel, ICT University, Cameroon.

(2) Shikha Singh, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gayatri Moharana, ICAR- Central Institute for Women in Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aseh Vitung Emmanuel, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shikha Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Views of ESP Learners on Code-Switching in Business English Classrooms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Associate Professor, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ronnie L. Torres, Saint Nicholas School English Programme – Oxford International Curriculum, Thailand.

(2) Nolan Severino R. Jusayan, De La Salle Medical and Health Sciences Institute, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ezemba Stephanie Adaora, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Linda Merzougui, Hunan Institute of Engineering, China.

(3) Rakhmat Wahyudin Sagala, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ronnie L. Torres, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nolan Severino R. Jusayan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biostimulant: Its Effect on the Growth and Survival of Asexually Propagated Mango Grafts (Mangifera indica L.) Cv. Alphonso

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vishal R. Wankhade, C. P. College of Agriculture, S. D. Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rowina T. Esconde, Kapalong College of Agriculture Sciences and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vishal R. Wankhade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rowina T. Esconde, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Biosakyne, A Formulation Based on Essential Oils from Zingiber officinale for Sustainable Control against Sugarcane Smut Disease Caused by Sporisorium scitamineum in Ratoon Crops

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nazimah Maqbool, Retired Professor, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Minnatullah, Sugarcane Research Institute, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mustafa Riyadh Mohammed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Minnatullah, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mustafa Riyadh Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Various Insecticides against Leaf Folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) in Rice and the Calculation of the Benefit-cost Ratio

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Associate Professor, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) AL-Maliki Ali Abdullha Sultan, Iraq.

(2) Ahasan Ullah Khan, Sylhet Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (AL-Maliki Ali Abdullha Sultan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahasan Ullah Khan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perception of Regarding Water Conservation Products and Identification of Problem Faced by Groundnut Farmers in Dhanera Taluka of Banaskantha District, Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Zerihun Goa, Wolaita Sodo Agricultural College, Ethiopia.

(2) Dagne Ababu Bishaw, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zerihun Goa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dagne Ababu Bishaw, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Purchasing Behaviour and Satisfaction Level of Farmers Regarding Groundnut Seeds

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumit Mittal, USA.

(2) Juhi Rupal, NIMS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumit Mittal, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Juhi Rupal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA