Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Assistant Professor, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Vidyagiri, Bantwal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shreenivas A. Desai, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

(2) Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.55/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Shreenivas A. Desai, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Felix Mereka Chipojola, Malawi) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Isidro Alberto Perez Bartolome, Associate Professor, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Al Furat Al Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmonnem S. Kahlel, Northern Technical University,  Iraq.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute (GEBRI), Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hayder Azeez Ali Al-Shebly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Anang Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramakant P Gajbhiye, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Yashwant Singh, Government College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ramakant P Gajbhiye, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Yashwant Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Sharma, SKUAST, India.

(2) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Jyoti Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Kou Hayakawa, Japan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. João Miguel Dias, Associate Professor, CESAM, University of Aveiro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrei Zbuchea, District Emergency Hospital of Ploiesti, Romania.

(2) Danilet Vi M. Mendoza, College of Arts and Sciences, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Andrei Zbuchea, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Danilet Vi M. Mendoza, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Edward Ching-Ruey, Luo, Associate Professor, National Chi Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Willis O. Aguko, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

(2) El Attmani Mohammed, University of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alexey Ju.Retejum, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia.

(2) Koua Tanoh Jean-Jacques, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, Côte d’Ivoire.

(3) Şeyma Merve Kaymaz Mühling, Turkey.

(4) Walid Nabil, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Awuh Mbia Ekolok, University of  Bamenda, Cameroon.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Willis O. Aguko, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (El Attmani Mohammed, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Maria Serrano, EPSO, University Miguel Hernandez, Orihuela, Alicante, Spain.

(2) Dr. Anil Kumar, Professor & Head, Devi Ahilya University, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Hayder Ahmed Khadim, Al-Bayan University, Iraq.

(2) Muhammad Abdurrahman Munir, Alma Ata University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Malancus Razvan Nicolae, Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Hayder Ahmed Khadim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Muhammad Abdurrahman Munir, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavya B. M, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, India.

(2) Manjusha Mahakarkar, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Radhikabai Meghe Memorial College of Nursing, India.

(3) Gyanendra Prasad Paudel, National College, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(4) Yosra Ben Fadhel, The Higher Institute of Medical Technologies, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Albina Amin, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.

(2) Areeeg Kamel Mahdi, Baghdad University, Iraq.

(3) Dacyr Dante de Oliveira Gatto, UNINOVE- Universidade Nove de Julho, Brazil.

(4) Dimitrios G. Konstantinides, University of the Aegean, Greece.

(5) Fiayaz Aleem Shaama, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago.

(6) Fülöp Melinda Timea, Babeş–Bolyai University, Romainia.

(7) Gabriela Gheorghiu, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

(8) Heber Anandan, Dr. Agarwal’s Eye Hospital, India.

(9) Luiz Roberto Nascimento, ENS-Brazilian School of Insurance, Brazil.

(10) Venkatesh Kamath B, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Bhavya B. M, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Manjusha Mahakarkar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Gyanendra Prasad Paudel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_4 (Yosra Ben Fadhel, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Associate Professor, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ileana Andreica, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

(2) Samir Mohamed Elrayes, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

(3) Maria Belem Arce Vazquez, Tecnológico Nacional de México, Tecnológico de Estudios Superiores de Ecatepec, México.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adebayo Ismail Abiola, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.

(2) Kruti Dave, Ganpat University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

(1) Tajudeen Yahaya, Federal University, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ileana Andreica, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (Samir Mohamed Elrayes, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Maria Belem Arce Vazquez, México) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S. Prabhu, Former Professor, Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering, Sriperumbudur, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ioana Stanciu, University of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) M. Dhanasekaran, Govt. Arts College, India.

(3) Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Kasr Alainy School of Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Gupta, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(2) Bahareh Allahverdi-Mamaghani, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Iran.

(3) Dorly, IPB University, Indonesia.

(4) Durga Madhab Kar, Siksha O Anusandhan, India.

(5) Gloria Helena González Blair, Colombia.

(6) Hemant Sarin, USA.

(7) H G S P Hewageegana, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(8) Robert Suslo, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland.

(9) Vishwas Sovani, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_1 (Ioana Stanciu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_2 (M. Dhanasekaran, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer review report_3 (Ehab Abdel Aziz Ahmed El-Shaarawy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA